2007-09-13 10:47:24 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
It is effective - in producing children
As the old joke says:-
Q: What do you call people who use the rhythm method?
A: Parents
2007-09-13 10:50:42 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 0⤋
Sorry, I'll have to look that up on Wikipedia to find out what it is.
Ooooooh, "natural" birth control.
Because they're bad at "timing".
I just read that most fertility experts have considered the Rhythm Method to have been obsolete for the last 20 years.
2007-09-13 10:50:14 · answer #2 · answered by ZER0 C00L ••AM••VT•• 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Because they like kids and they don't think having kids is a bad thing.
BTW, the "rhythm method" is old and obsolete. People who use natural family planning nowadays base their observations on scientifically proven signs of ovulation. And they use these signs to ACHIEVE pregnancy as often as they use it to delay pregnancy. Furthermore, ALL women should learn how their bodies work and observe their signs of fertility, because they'll be able to detect problems such as cervical cancer very early on when treatment is most effective.
2007-09-13 11:11:36 · answer #3 · answered by sparki777 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
And I always thought the "Rhythm Method" meant listening to James Brown while you're doing it. Hmm... maybe that's why I have eleven kids...
2007-09-13 11:01:01 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because it is an effective way of having lots of kids.
Did you hear about the Jewish drummer who's rhythm was so good he was made an honorary Catholic?
2007-09-13 10:52:20 · answer #5 · answered by Simon T 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
We don't use any "method". Having many children is wonderful :)
2007-09-13 10:52:46 · answer #6 · answered by CJ 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
very confusing factor. research in google. that could actually help!
2014-10-30 22:33:51 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
There is a rhythm to it - a baby every 9 or 10 months. Duh!
2007-09-13 10:56:25 · answer #8 · answered by bandycat5 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I've honestly never heard anyone say it was.
2007-09-13 10:52:01 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Um, because they're wrong and naive?
2007-09-13 10:51:37 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋