Free speech is a great thing, and I'm thankful it is alive and well in America.
But with that free speech should come some sense of responsibility.
Moveon.org is irresponsible in the poison it prints.
To call a man" Betray us"is so very high school, so infantile and such a lie.
But that isn't what worries me most about moveon.org.
The important and damaging thing is the way they are controlling the Democratic candidates. Those running for President are terrified of this group. They do whatever this group wants. No group should be able to manipulate a campaign like this.
It ought to make every American angry. But most Americans seem to be asleep or something.
2007-09-13 09:10:18
·
answer #1
·
answered by ? 6
·
2⤊
4⤋
Moveon.org, although obnoxious and willing to fudge details to push an agenda, is no different than O'reilly or Limbaugh, who do exactly the same. All of them are making a living from selling politics, period.
Al-Qaeda is killing people and Americans, if you are at the point where you are having a problem distinguishing the difference, I suggest turning your AM radio off.
You should know by now that there is little difference between Republicans and Democrats. Bush has increased spending and done nothing to Ban Abortion in 8 years. On the otherside, the democrats cannot provide universal health care. Both parties just make money from corporations and tussle over who gets the most, by winning elections.
2007-09-13 08:56:15
·
answer #2
·
answered by ɹɐǝɟsuɐs Blessed Cheese Maker 7
·
2⤊
3⤋
If Obama is a "left-wing socialist" then what do you call unquestionably left wing socialists? I recommend, i do no longer even like Obama or maximum of his rules, yet it quite is merely no longer a correct thank you to describe what he's executed. I recommend he used a re-hashed Republican theory from the early 90s, known because it "exchange", and exceeded a well being care "reform" bill no person quite likes. He has saved each and every physique of Bush's anti-terrorism (professional constitutional rights obstacles) rules. He has escalated the conflict in Afghanistan. He cut back a handle PhRMA to guard their salary. He has no longer something yet former Wall highway/ Federal Reserve people engaged on his financial team.
2016-11-15 03:45:29
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Obviously Al-Qaeda - the terrorists who are attempting to ruin everything, terrorists that use planes as bombs and kill thousands, terrorists that are obviously just the pawns of Iran's plan to export their terrorism to every Arab country in the world, beginning with neighboring Iraq and Afghanistan. . HELLO?!?!?!?!?!!!!!
Lt Col Kilgore, if that is who you say you are, I respectfully implore you to wake up and avoid the temptation to "blink", which is what this question is the equivalent to, and realize that the terrorists actions over the last two decades is an attempt to establish Islamic world domination with them as the leaders. The United States and all the nations of Europe, the Americas, Australia and non Islamic Asia stand in the way of that goal. At some point people in general are going to have to wake up to this fact.
MoveOn.org, although a valuable tool in sniffing out and preventing corruption among US politicians is at some point going to have to modify its views and opinions. And that is all it has to do. And since it is called "move on", at least it has the potential to be able to do that and change with the times. MoveOn.org also is a voice for peace, which is a very valuable thing, especially if you want to stay alive soldier. If there is a way to avoid the escalation of this war and end the nightmare's that it has caused we need to find it, and MoveOn.org is one of the many voices for peace. SO USE IT SOLDIER!!! LET'S HEAR YOUR VOICE FOR PEACE!!!!
Otherwise, you reveal that you are pro war and against peace yourself.
I rest my case.
2007-09-13 09:03:12
·
answer #4
·
answered by endpov 7
·
1⤊
2⤋
Well, both Col. The islamofacist and the moveon.org folks both want to do away with the Freedoms of Speech, Worship, Association, Self protection, etc.
The only difference for me is that the islamist will try kill me on sight because of my sexual orientation while the liberal loonies don't.
When the final push comes, you will find my body at the top of the big mound of dead jihadists. ;-)
2007-09-13 08:57:16
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
4⤋
It's Al-Queda by a nose going into the back stretch with moveon.org coming up on the outside. Now their into the back stretch! It's Al-Queda! No it's moveon.org! No, it's Al-Queda! It looks like it's gonna be close! And it's a photo finish! Oh my goodness! IT'S A TIE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
2007-09-13 08:54:02
·
answer #6
·
answered by yagman 7
·
2⤊
4⤋
The greatest threat to America is the trust citizens place in government, media, large corporations and schools.
A conspiracy is well underway to dispose of most of us, and as silly as this sounds, I've researched it for 5 years, and have ample and irrefutable proof.
.
2007-09-13 08:53:20
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
2⤋
Uh, the enemy within is currently George W. Bush. He's done us far more harm than either of the groups you mention.
2007-09-13 09:08:31
·
answer #8
·
answered by tehabwa 7
·
2⤊
3⤋
Considering that the US military (as part of their recent efforst to sweeten sunni insurgents over to their side all over the middle-east) have started funding Syrian proxy organizations of Al Qaeda, i would suggest that they (the US military) consider the website a bigger problem since they don't fund it.
2007-09-13 08:52:59
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
3⤋
I don't think Iraq was threat to us. Our govt just can't stay out of interfering with other countries. Why did we attack Iraq anyways? It was Saudi Arabia----15 hi-jackers came from there. Last I checked, Saudi is still making deals with us.
Bush wanted monopoly on oil----he got it. We should be fearful of our govt making wrong decisions. Iraq was not capable of attacking us? We got ourselves in trouble. because of one stupid mistake of Bush, many American lives have been lost.
Personally, I don't think he would call back the troops. because he doesn't want to be the one making this decision. he wants the next president to have this headache. he wants to be the one known for saving us....BS
2007-09-13 08:53:57
·
answer #10
·
answered by keera 4
·
4⤊
3⤋