2007-09-13 08:34:06 · 8 answers · asked by zebbie g 2 in Sports ➔ Boxing
thank goodness this fight never happend. with spinks devestating power in both hands and boxing ability and size and saad muhammads style of taking opponents full arsenal and then trying to come back, spinks would have really hurt him and this would be black eye for boxing
2007-09-14 08:48:21 · answer #1 · answered by mike c 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. Matthew grew to become into too lots of a throwback era warrior for his very own reliable in a changing era of scientific boxing heralded by using the advance of former Olympic standouts as Cassius Clay/Muhammad Ali and after him the likes of Sugar Ray Leonard and Michael Spinks who complemented their already great skills with modern offensive and protecting recommendations as utilising the angles. No way is Matthew going to conquer Mike along with his Spinks Jinx which had claimed sixteen KOs in his first 22 fights.. Matthew might have survived Mike's skill punching yet certainly he would be no tournament for Mike's extra suitable boxing. Spinks by using UD or late around stoppage.
2016-12-26 09:10:47 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Muhammad vs Spinks is like Mayweather Jr. vs Gatti. A repeat, with Muhammad's corner throwing in the towel by round 8.
2007-09-13 13:57:54 · answer #3 · answered by Devon P 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
saad muhammad was tough but would have taken a beating against spinks,spinks would have stopped him .
2007-09-13 13:50:04 · answer #4 · answered by victorottchiefs 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes. Mike was undefeated at light heavyweight. Not that I want it but if you ask a question give out a best answer for the person that deserves it.
2007-09-13 09:33:52 · answer #5 · answered by gman 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Easily.
2007-09-13 10:27:22 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
no.saad was hard and rough,he seemed to have a harder life than spinks and sometimes the harder the tougher.saad by 10rd tko
2007-09-16 13:41:50 · answer #7 · answered by saxaphonist 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Mathew is to slow for Michael....
2007-09-13 14:53:16 · answer #8 · answered by gannoway 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋