I read about how the soil of tropical rainforests cannnot sustain intensive farming since they are not as fertile as arable land. It suggests that instead we should now maximise yields on existing arable land instead of clearing tropical rainforests. I would like to ask why can arable land sustain agriculture for so long since the soil has been cleared of its trees anyway and decomposition no longer occurs as frequently which makes the soil degenerate eventually too. Therefore why is it suggested that we should maximise on existing arable lands since by logic they will like the not very fertile soils of tropical rainforest eventually degenerate unless arable land can somehow regenerate nutrients which tropical rainforest soil cannot.
2007-09-13
03:22:34
·
6 answers
·
asked by
t a
2
in
Environment
➔ Other - Environment