why is it that some christians girls wear it to church when it is a sin and where can we find it in the bible.
2007-09-13 03:05:34 · 12 answers · asked by gracie 1 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Wearing pants is a sin but Hitler was okay in attempted genocide, right? Great religion, really.
2007-09-13 03:12:10 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Even if the Bible were more than just a collection of silly old books, wearing trousers would not be a sin, seeing as the Bible says nothing about it.
2007-09-13 10:17:57 · answer #2 · answered by wondermus 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
it is so important not to judge other girls that are wearing pants. you are asking a question to a group of people who do not believe that wearing pants is a sin. people have to get their own convictions in their own hearts in order for those convictions to stick. if it something that is pounded just over the pulpit, the people will call it brainwashing. if it is given by God, then people cannot fight against it. There are convictions that i have because God gave them to me and because he gave them to me no one can take them away. that doesn't mean that i look down on others because they do not share the same convictions. It wasn't even spoken of 100 years ago. Women wore dresses and that was that. times changed drastically especially during ww2 when it was becoming more prominant for women to wear pants as they entered the workforce while our men were out fighting in the war. it is funny to me that women who wear dresses and skirts all the time are made fun of when it was the norm less than 100 years ago. Again, i think it is so important that we never have the attitude that we are better than anyone else. For if it wasn't for the grace of God, I wouldn't be where i am. I believe that the moment we lack holiness (without which no man shall see God) on the inside, then separation (come out from among them and be ye separate) does us absolutely no good and we are no better than the pharisees and scribes who longed to opress with legalism. We have to have convictions that the Lord sets before us and what we have, we cannot cram down others throats. if THEY pray with an honest heart for God to give them the convictions through his word that they need, then God will give them what THEY need. it's not something man can give because the more you say, the more you push them away. if you have a conviction against wearing pants, then follow that conviction without trying to impose it on others. feel free to email me if you need to.
2007-09-13 10:39:21 · answer #3 · answered by christy 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
We came into the world naked. Any rules placed upon us are just that: "rules"
What is a sin is listening to this rubbish and not thinking for yourself.
Do you want to wear trousers? Then wear them.
Do you want to wear a dress / skirt? Then wear it.
What would be the logic of "trousers being a sin". It isn't logical.
2007-09-13 10:12:35 · answer #4 · answered by KD 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Wearing trousers is a sin?
Which bible are you reading?
You remind me of those Pharasees Jesus spoke about who like to create more rules than necessary to place additional burdens on people.
If you don't like to wear trousers, then don't wear them. You have no right to force your personal prejudices on others while grasping at scriptural straws to back it up.
2007-09-13 10:10:55 · answer #5 · answered by pixie_pagan 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Does it ( the bible) designate the length of the pants? Is it then alright for females to wear bloomers or underpants?..Made the same, different fabric...and is church the only place they shouldn't wear them? Is one building different from another? Who says it's a sin? God certainly wouldn't care as long as you believed...
2007-09-13 10:15:22 · answer #6 · answered by Boopsie 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I believe the mention of wearing mens clothes was much different in the OT. It doesn't apply now. We have freedom in Christ and can wear anything (unless it is slutty and provocative)
2007-09-13 10:16:40 · answer #7 · answered by Kaliko 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Is it a sin? Since when?
Every day I discover something new. It is amazing.
2007-09-13 10:20:45 · answer #8 · answered by remy 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
"Trouser" might be a problem, as it would only cover one leg, but "trousers" are all right.
2007-09-13 10:18:23 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Only if there's already a man inside them!
2007-09-13 10:21:00 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋