What's more important in life, response ability or responsibility?

Question

In my life, I have witnessed things get taken care of by people who can do it, not necessarily by people who, on paper, are supposed to do it! What about you? What have you learned?

Godshew,
He wasn't too graceful at times! Calling people names and pretending as if some would go to some horrific afterlife for sins here and telling parables that lead people into temptation of spreading physical terror on earth like Luke 19 27, "Bring my enemies to my feet and kill them there!". This man was a lunatic at times!

I love him, but not for his entire wisdom. He had issues.

Healing be unto you and yours and me and mine

Forgive Affirmed Spirit

Answer 1

I have learned that they people who do it on paper or "manage"the rest of us real workers, are often incapable of doing the jobs their self, even though they may have a degree for it. And those of us do can do the job, often get overloooked forour abilities and talenats and suggestions that we make to thiese imbicles, just because we dont have the degrees that they do. sometimes i find it is better to overlook the manager and go straight to a director if you have a goood suggestion, or if you email, them send copies to both of them. cant reallly hurt and at lest then if the manager later presents the idea to the directier, he knows it is not an origianl idea. i have been a nurse 7 years and regular staff is routinely ignored, whilein the same amount of time we have had 5 managers. LOL. the saying is " those who cant do, manage" they have the bok ability but not the practical abitilt to handle what we do day to day.

howerve my very first job was exactly the opossite,as i was much younger, i got alot of help and special attention from the manager.but i was think this was due to the fact that at one time she too had been in my position and then worked her way up.

Answer 2

It's difficult for anyone to take such a question seriously given it's faux-intellectual nature. You're either trying to appear clever with your word-play, or you're trying to be clever with *someone else's* word-play, both of which are deplorable.
So for a start, I'd say not formulating questions this way is more important than doing so.
Being able to do something in no way constitutes a responsibility to do it. Equally (though many will see this as paradoxical), being in a specified role with apparent duties doesn't constitute any responsibility. Responsibility is all a matter of personal, *chosen*, moral codes but it can be argued that no such codes have any inherent 'rightness', being merely one set of codes thought up by one or more people with no greater credibility than any other. Thus, a person can perfectly reasonably argue that he can do whatever he pleases and take no responsibility for anything whatsoever - especially since the nature of free-will has not been proven. In other words, how can anyone speak of something being anyone's responsibility if no one can control what they do?
One philosophical argument that has been posited is that all men have an in-built capacity to know what is right; some have added that this is a matter of divine influence, that is, the truth of God.
A practical approach would be to act according to what works best in life considering how one must live amongst other people. Thus, deciding how to act revolves around creating love and friendship, being liked. Thus, taking on responsibilities even though none may exist, can earn others' respect, which brings rewards that help to smooth life's path. One must beware however of casual differentiation between 'response ability' and 'responsibility' because although to some it may seem 'cute' to do so, it actually serves to cloud the fact that a person may have a great heart and sense of altruism, and be working to the best of his ability (though it may be poor), and be judged a lesser man because another came along and seized an opportunity for self-aggrandizement on account of some natural skill while having no consideration for others. So is a man's worth to be judged solely by what he does or does the quality of his *intentions* have any bearing on the matter? Also, one may assume responsibility for ignoble causes. Is a man to be judged great because he's a capable soldier and another judged poorly because he's not?
So neither is more important than the other, the question being inherently narrow.

Answer 3

Deliverance, from evil(law), is once, for all:

Our Father, deliver us from evil: Matthew 6:13
We are delivered from the law: Romans 7:6

After that if any get entangled again,
then it's "recover themselves", or not;
And if not, then it's a "worse"-end scenario.

Man made whole: go and sin(law) no more, lest...
Woman not condemned: go and sin(law) no more
Children: be no more children(know nots), grow up

To help others recover themselves
you first have be converted yourself:
Eg: JC unto Peter(called Satan):
when(not if) thou art converted,
then strengthen thy (scatter brained) brethren

The GRACE of our Lord Jesus Christ with you all. Amen.

Answer 4

I think being responsible is more important. If one is accountable for his or her actions and is someone a person can count on, I think the response ability follows naturally.

Answer 5

response ability i know as high and so so so just as it is in how i must perform, and responsibility describes of the load i carry within its performance and processing untill done

Answer 6

I've learned that I can gain an ability and that I am responsible for my own actions

Answer 7

i ave learned that i should not depend on other people to do something but rather do it myself.

Answer 8

We have not response ability, we are resposible what we do , so our resposibility is to do Good, its