2007-09-12
23:56:54
·
35 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Society & Culture
➔ Religion & Spirituality
Phantoms wife309,,,air exists,I can breath it smell it chemically analise it and atomically wiegh it,
2007-09-13
00:02:15 ·
update #1
Wolfmetle.....what rainbows are the refraction of light through suspended water droplets,,,,,sunseys are just the sun going down over the horizon and the red/orange end of the spectrum being filtered by the dust particles suspended in the atmosphere....
2007-09-13
00:07:08 ·
update #2
Martin S and Amarito,,your explanation is your way of explaining something you cannot explain,,that`s it just say it was all Gods work without investigation,,,that is why humans thought the Earth was flat,,because man was happy to explain it all away by saying it`s Gods work,,,,,Now show me some proper proof,,not just explaining away what you think should be
2007-09-13
00:10:18 ·
update #3
Martin S and Amarito,,your explanation is your way of explaining something you cannot explain,,that`s it just say it was all Gods work without investigation,,,that is why humans thought the Earth was flat,,because man was happy to explain it all away by saying it`s Gods work,,,,,Now show me some proper proof,,not just explaining away what you think should be
2007-09-13
00:10:28 ·
update #4
OK I WILL TELL YOU WHAT,AS NONE OF YOU CAN PROVE GODS EXISTANCE WITHOUT EITHER QUOTING THE BIBLE WHICH WAS WRITTEN BY ROMAN SCRIBES AROUND 403AD UNDER THE GUIDANCE OF THE THEN FLEDGLING ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH I WILL IGNORE ALL ANSWERS THAT CANNOT GIVE ME PROOF THAT CANNOT BE SCIENTIFICALLY EXPLAINED.....
2007-09-13
00:13:53 ·
update #5
A Colathil,,,the last person who tried to argue against the Koran had a death sentance put on him,,Salman Rushdi...so science is hesitant to attack it....
2007-09-13
00:31:04 ·
update #6
So most of you say science is nothing more than theory,,,,and so to is the theory of God,,,,,
2007-09-13
00:32:06 ·
update #7
Kenny P,,I exist because I can answer your question,,,I can write it down and I have a profile page,,OK so that you may say is the same as the Bible,gods written word etc etc,,,,but you cannot prove it was Gods words it is only what another person has told you,,what another says is Gods words,,,All the many religeons around the world claim the same,,
2007-09-13
00:38:20 ·
update #8
you do not make sense yourself dumbo, the old testament was written before 403A.D. , the Jews read the Old Testament and Jesus quoted from the old testament. And if the Romans wrote the bible why would they glorify Jesus and resurrect him from the dead. Please research your answers. As for the proof of Gods Existence before man, Please explain to me what caused the big bang to happen. was it just a random act of atoms. You will see enough proof when you are in Hell suffering for eternity, so you better enjoy that bong you are toking now while you can enjoy things on earth.
2007-09-13 01:27:35
·
answer #1
·
answered by Timothy B 4
·
0⤊
3⤋
So you want proof God existed before man. Lets face it no matter what anyone says to you the proof you seek will not be good enough. So maybe your point was to try and prove Man invented God. You tell people not to quote the Bible and yet the Bible is living proof that GOD exists.. For example lets just take how many predicts have come true in both the old and new testement. Do you think that was all some big that just sorta happened? It has been proven by the "non religious sector" that proof has been found that people mentioned in the bible really did exist.
It's called FAITH either you believe or you don't. I think there is enough proof out there. So the question is what exactly are you looking for in ways of proof... I see proof in the flowers, the sunrise and sunset, the stars in the sky, a baby just borned and birds in the sky
2007-09-13 00:07:52
·
answer #2
·
answered by dumpllin 5
·
2⤊
2⤋
particular, this occurs. it incredibly is not intellectually straightforward, and it incredibly is not logical. it incredibly is an occasion of a number of fallacies, which includes "Straw guy" (misrepresenting the opponent's argument extremely than combating it theory for theory straight away) and "Elephant Hurling" (throwing out a physique of knowledge without exhibiting the way it proves the element). thoughts could be dealt with frivolously, not antagonistically, and in an intellectually straightforward way. by way of fact if one edge or the different in simple terms tries to discredit or misrepresent or conceal up the different edge, they have not incredibly "gained" the argument have they? I say that if Atheists have been incredibly in simple terms blobs of atoms in a chemical reaction, they does not probable get so riled up approximately it. It wouln't rely what they think of roughly their Atheism or what any Christian thinks approximately his Christianity, they might the two be atoms power and chemical compounds. Their "suggestions" (if we actually might use this way of be conscious) may be no extra desirable than themical reactions interior a larger chemical reaction referred to as the suggestions. meaning that considering their "suggestions" and "evaluations" at the instant are not something extra desirable than atoms, those issues may be not extra signifigant than a pencil or a marble or a toe or a twig or a soda pop that has long previous flat. The suggestions of the two edge might have no value. In shirt, in case your suggestions are incredibly actual products that are discovered interior your cranium, then what makes them extra signifigant thant the different actual merchandise?
2016-10-10 12:03:32
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
The Theory of Evolution, the Big Bang Theory, the Theory of Creation...They all share the same thing, they're all theories. Science does not even know which one is real. What made atoms exist? Another Big Bang? The perfect evidence is the way people reason out.
2007-09-13 00:08:52
·
answer #4
·
answered by chan-chan 3
·
2⤊
2⤋
The evolution of the universe. The foundation for the existence of life on this planet. God knew life would need oxygen, that flowers would need bees to pollinate them, that trees needed animals and humans for carbon dioxide to survive, that all water shouldn't be salty, that the Earth and it's inhabitants needed sunlight to flourish, that planets need gravity to hold them together, that each individual part of the universe needed atoms and their counter parts to become the universe, that vegetation needed clouds to produce rain in areas where no other water can be found.
That the universe started from nothing and continues to grow.
The list goes on and on.
Could all these things have just happened by chance?
2007-09-13 00:19:02
·
answer #5
·
answered by Cal 5
·
2⤊
3⤋
There are many good arguments for the existence of God both in science and philosophy. Heres a good place to start.
2007-09-13 00:33:48
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
The proof is Holy Qur-an.Please read it care fully. You will certainly get sufficient proof in each and every chapter.
Holy Qur-an it self is a proof as there no author and taught to mankind through an illiterate man called prophet Mohamed in 7th century explaining most modern scientific invention such as big ban theory,human Embriology etc in such a way that no scientist can dispute it.
2007-09-13 00:27:17
·
answer #7
·
answered by a.kolathil 7
·
2⤊
4⤋
Show me the proof that anyone else existed before we were born. Written records can be false and pictures can be faked.
2007-09-13 00:24:24
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
there is no proof, that is why we have all this reglious conflict in the world today.
I believe diffrent early cultures made thier versions of "god" to help explain things that they could not find a reason for or explain. ie--eclipses, ect. Then later on reglion was used as a tool to control the masses of people. As it sometimes is still today. This is an inexhaustible subject for controversy.
however it is interesting that many cultures have a creation story that includes a flooding of the earth--the mayans had the popol vul, christian have noah and his ark, ect--
so there must be truth to tthat
2007-09-13 00:07:42
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
4⤋
That's impossible. But I will say that the scientific way of looking at the world is only one way.
2007-09-13 02:50:27
·
answer #10
·
answered by good tree 6
·
2⤊
0⤋