English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Why is this more efficient than most other simple methods? Why is the pointer significant in the coding of one of them? Thanks

2007-09-12 13:50:54 · 1 answers · asked by Galbadian 2 in Science & Mathematics Engineering

1 answers

Because you can maintain pointers to the data (on both storage and retrieval) as a modulo-n counter (where n is the number of stages) and the constants (the impulse response of the filter) in another, identical aray.

It's just a lot less code and monkey-motion ☺

Doug

2007-09-12 15:02:15 · answer #1 · answered by doug_donaghue 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers