that a PS3 is way better than a wii and xbox 360 combined? and EVERYONE knows it is. Is it because they are mad that they bought it and know they are stuck with it?
2007-09-12 10:52:25 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Consumer Electronics ➔ Games & Gear ➔ PlayStation
Ps3's cost an exorbitant amount of money compared to a 360. And besides, there are WAY more games for a 360 then there are for ps3. And you can't just compare different systems. That's just dumb.
2007-09-12 10:56:57 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Guy obviously has no idea what he's talking about. The PS3 has never been reported to start a fire. The XBX, on the other hand, has been known to start fires. That's been confirmed in the news. And who said the PS3 doesn't have rumble. Immersion and Sony settled their lawsuit, and as part of the settlement, Sony would pay Immersion money to help make the rumble compatible with the Sixaxis.
Is the PS3 better than a Wii and 360 combined? That's a matter of opinion. The PS3 can have the greatest graphics in the world, the best games in the world, the best online play in the world, etc, but it doesn't mean anything if you're not having fun with it. As long as you're having fun with the PS3, then it is the best system out there If someone else is having a lot of fun with his Wii, then the Wii is the greatest system. Same for the 360.
I got the Dreamcast, and it was a flop, but I won't consider it a flop because I had a lot of fun with the DC. Soul Calibur II was available on the DC first, and it was one of the best weapons fighting game ever made.
2007-09-12 19:15:12 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
In a next year PS3 has more than 300 games coming. It's calculating power is around 3 times more than XBOX 360. 8 kernels in PS3 against 3 in XBOX, this already means something. By the way, XBOX 360 runs on regular DVD's (capacity 4.7 gb), PS3 runs on Blu-rays (50 gb now, 200 later). I work with computers a lot, so I now a little about those things, I'm a happy owner of PS3.
2007-09-13 12:39:07 · answer #3 · answered by Bull Goose Loony 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
because the PS3 isn't better for some people. it dpends on what you want the system for. if you want alot of good games and kick *** graphics, you want a 360. if you are rich, and want to spend alot of $ on a system that is ok, but won't ever has as many games they get a PS3. same with the online. if you want good online play, 360. if you want it to be free and don't care about the quality of the online play, PS3. the PS3's only redeming qualities, for now, are the low falure rate, and uh........ hmmm. i'll get back 2 u on that.
2007-09-13 02:28:45 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
actually no..... by next year theyre supposed to have only 145 games.. theres only 28 now.... THE CONTROLLER DOESNT EVEN VIBRATE.. Sony thinks that is "last generation".... they over priced for something not so good... some kid left his PS3 on over night and his house got burned down. Its like when someone tells a joke over and over and its just not funny anymore..Sony ruined the ps3 by going too far too fast and making it bad, ps1 was good for its time, ps2 was better....almost everyone that has ONE game console has a PS2, whats so good about it that made them price it 600 dollars??
2007-09-12 18:49:49 · answer #5 · answered by Frank 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well,they said the same about Betamax, The mini disk & blue ray. The sales numbers over time will judge if your right or not.
2007-09-12 18:41:47 · answer #6 · answered by lana_sands 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
ps3 sucks ****
2007-09-12 19:05:56 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋