If abortions are illegalized....?

Question

Are we gonna' have a lot of dumpster babies and MASSIVE overpopulations? Byebye Earth's natural resourses.

Answer 1

Well, I got somethin' to say,

I killed your baby today...

Answer 2

Maybe we could find a way to feed the hungry with dumpster babies?

Okay, that was nasty and I admit that, but I've noticed that once these babies who were unwanted get here, many - even MOST - anti-choice people don't give a damn about them. Yes, there are some - a number on this site - who have adopted and who volunteer and do things to help these people, but more often than not, the answer is

-"if she didn't want a baby, she should have kept her legs together" and

-"Feeding your kid isn't the government's responsibility. YOU had the kid, YOU deal with it" and

-"Get a JOB so you can feed your kid" and

-"Where are the PARENTS when these kids are out raising hell?" and

-"Old enough to do the crime, you're old enough to do the time" and

-"I don't care. He took a life, so he should be executed."

So unless you adopt, help families get affordable child care while they work, donate to after school programs, and work in a half-way house, I don't think you're doing enough once these little bundles of joy are born. It really *does* take a village (it's one of the few things Hilary & I agree on).

Answer 3

Your speculation looks to fail to account for right here huge training of people who help abortion: a million. women folk 2. Married men 3. Infertile men (certainly or by way of vasectomy) 4. Abstinent men further, it fails to account for the assumption of abortion being a _woman's_ selection - for sure, if their reason grew to become into as you're saying, would not those human beings be pushing for the properly suited of a guy to compel somebody to have an abortion, so they don't get caught with the youngster-help money. And FYI, i'm already training abstinence - in reality, i'm between the few men my age who can easily say that he remains a virgin. So close your hollow.

Answer 4

Yes there would be too many people. Our earth can't support the people we have now. Think of all th starving children in poor countries. Why should people bring a child into the world when they know it will have a bad life? Abortion in some cases really is the most loving thing to do.

Answer 5

Long before the governement saw it fit to even bother to interfere in women's wombs, we mothers, sisters, daughters, wives have always made our choice of whether or not to take a pregnancy to term and will continue to do so irregardless.

Personally, I think abortion should not even be government business any more so than menstruation. There should be no public rules FOR or AGAINST.

If organizations, individuals or pharmaceutical companies want to provide those services, they should be free to do so but without public funding.

And women should be free to choose without the governement getting involved in their business. Truth is there is NO WAY to enforce a ban on abortion unless you plan to monitor EVERY single pregnant woman to ensure she carries to term.

Right now I can list off a number of herbs that grow right in your back yard that are abortive in nature and women have used since the stone age to end pregnancy. This is and always has been a private matter and should remain so.

Answer 6

Catholic Crusader: "the earth is bigger than you think"

Overpopulation has very little to do with space. It has to do with limited resources and distribution. There are already too many kids being born with not enough people willing to adopt. As far as I can tell, Christians don't actually care what happens to kids after they're born as long as they can force their beliefs on people
It's disgusting that they want to control other people like this but don't care about the kids themselves
I also find it really sick when Christians say that abortion shouldn't even be allowed in the case of rape. I can't understand how they can be so insensitive as to say that the "rights" of a bunch of cells is more important than sparing a rape victim the further trauma of having to carry her rapists baby to term.

Answer 7

I don't think it would cause overpopulation because abortion isn't prevalent enough, but I do think there would be a lot more babies that are thrown in dumpsters or otherwise abused, murdered and neglected by parents who don't want them.

Answer 8

Only God knows that.Which they shouldnt do that.They can give them away.And in my state MISSOURI
they give birth control at the heath unit to those whom cant afford it also condoms.Lets pray that doesnt happen to the babies and abortion is made against the law.

Answer 9

More dumpster babies, back alley abortions, as well as injuries and deaths caused by young women/girls trying to do it themselves.

I am not a believer in abortion as birth control, but I am old enough to remember what it was like before it was available.

My cousin was not able to abort a child conceived after she was abducted and raped by two men. She was 15.

Answer 10

I think people would get them in back alleys and have unprofessionals do it anyway. I am against abortion, but I don't know if making it illegal will wipe it out.


My aunt died of hemorrhage from an abortion performed outside of a clinic when she was 16.

Answer 11

There will be an increase in crime in 18-25 years do to the children improperly raised by parents that didn't want them.

This, statistically, has been proven and born out in the great crime reduction in the US that we experienced in the 90's. (18 years after Roe v Wade)