Can they not see that an eye and an ear are made by a creator person called God?
Y do they not Thank Him and instead pray to a science?
Do U know that evolution is just a faith in a accident. LOL!!!1!
Answer me that , athietst.
2007-09-12
03:52:31
·
26 answers
·
asked by
Bajingo
6
in
Society & Culture
➔ Religion & Spirituality
Sorry typos, OK then
*Atheist*
Is that all UR argument that you have?
LOL!!11 Evolution needs more faith 2 belive in a accident that makes eyes and a heart that beats and a soul that Loves God.
U know that but ur so arregant that you worship a science and urself.
Typical Atheist.
2007-09-12
04:11:27 ·
update #1
UPDATE:
Hexley I dint say they PREY to a science, I sed they PRAY to a science. If ur gonna make a fun of my spelling then ur guilty 2. Typical Atheist.
2007-09-12
04:14:02 ·
update #2
Hi, Bajingo. Sad to see people responding to typos rather than to substance, eh?
Though atheists don't claim science is god, they clearly express great faith. For example, the claim that amino acid molecules could assemble themselves into a living cell, capable of metabolism and reproduction, with highly complex subcellular machinery, requires far greater faith that recognition of an Intelligent Designer. It's like the faith that a tornado could sweep through a junkyard and assemble a fully functioning '57 Chevy with the keys in the ignition.
Cheers,
Bruce
2007-09-12 04:39:54
·
answer #1
·
answered by Bruce 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
The important thing here is to say that correct spelling and grammar are useful when asking a serious question. Please apply both of them in the future. However, since this is just a false assertion disguised as a question, I'll answer to the best of my understanding of this inane drivel.
1) No one, including you, has ever seen any of the gods make an eye or an ear. There is a great body of direct evidence that indicates that these structures have evolved over time.
2) To my knowledge, no one has ever prayed to a field of study such as science. To do so would be even more pointless than praying to imaginary gods.
3) Evolution is not driven by chance or accidents. Science does not claim that it is.
4) I am not an athietsts [sic], nor am I an atheist (if that's what you meant). There is no reason to think that someone's belief or lack of a belief in the gods (any or all) is a credential for understanding science and facts. There is no substance to that reasoning.
2007-09-12 04:07:44
·
answer #2
·
answered by coralsnayk 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
A) Atheists don't claim that science is God, atheists don't believe there is a God.
B) That sentence made a mockery of the English language, and would seem to demonstrate a lack of intelligence that atheists might not see the questioning as being valid coming from.
C) An eye or an ear is made by stem cells which organize themselves acording to what the genetic code delegates to them. Said genetic code was structured by billions of years of mistakes.
D) "Y" is not a word, other than possibly as an abreviation for "Yes", as in "(Y/N)".
E) They don't prey to sciences, and don't see any reason why they should think there would be anyone to thank.
F) Actually, evolution has nothing to do with either accidents or faith. Ambiogenesis it would be possible to define that way, but evolution is a structured process for improvement, it has nothing to do with accidents. (Though it does have something to do with mistakes, a completely different matter).
G) Oh... I don't know of anyone that actually mixes 1's and !'s when not mocking... I am sorry for the preceding, you are quite clearly either making a joke that I failed to get, or mentally handicapped.
H) Dude, next time a few more subtle clues would be nice BEFORE I get 6 points down... Being unable to spell "atheists" isn't nearly enough these days.
2007-09-12 04:06:41
·
answer #3
·
answered by yelxeH 5
·
3⤊
0⤋
1) You misspelled the word "atheist" in two different ways.
2) Atheists don't claim that. There is no god, so there is no substitute of a god.
3) Science is not to be prayed at. Science has evidence. Prayer is believing WITHOUT evidence. To pray science is a downright contradiction. No self respecting atheist does it.
4) We can't thank a being we find is imaginary.
5) Evolution is a NON-random process overall - that is, it is not an accident. And prayer = faith. Evolution has literally a mountain of evidence so faith in it is moot.
6) The eye and ear thing you mentioned is using the Argument From Design - it doesn't work. Try again.
-- And, yes, I know you're an atheist pretending to be a theist fundie - so my answers are to w/e fundies may be roaming around who actually believe in that junk. --
2007-09-12 03:58:49
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
I really hope and strongly suspect you are a troll. But for those who might think this is a serious question here goes:
I do not claim Science is God. Science is a method which has proven to be very useful in reaching truth.
I do not see anything being made by gods. I see things change over time ( evolution).
I don't believe in either gods or accidents. I believe in Mathematics.
2007-09-12 04:01:54
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
You can't spell and you expect us to take you seriously.
Evolution is not a random accident.
Study mutations and natural selection.
Swallow that, then try to hang with the big boys (and girls).
Science is the reason you are not a fossil.
I do not pray to the laws of gravity. Get real.
EDIT: Oh crap, he's not a troll. I had no idea people got this delusional...
2007-09-12 04:00:30
·
answer #6
·
answered by Dalarus 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Heh, nice question Banjo.
Atheists don't believe in God so would never claim that science is God.
I don't have faith in an accident, I understand that different things have actions and reactions, due to physics.
I know that certain elements when charged by electricity cause the spontaneous creation of amino acids. I know that amino acids are the building blocks of DNA and life as we know it.
I don't know what caused amino acids to eventually interact with each other to cause life, but am definitely not willing to claim leprechauns did it, as I have no evidence for leprechauns.
I expect that science will one day be able to duplicate the reactions that caused amino acids to interact with one another, but until then, am not willing to assign it to myth, doing that would cause people to stop seeking the true answer.
Hope this helps banjo.
2007-09-12 03:57:41
·
answer #7
·
answered by ɹɐǝɟsuɐs Blessed Cheese Maker 7
·
4⤊
0⤋
This atheist never said that Science is god, and does not pray.
Eyes and ears are evolutionary adaptations.
Evolution is not an accident. Snowflakes do not form even six-sided figures (often very beautiful) by accident. They are directed by a simple physical forces.
Nice work though. You've been studying under Windom Earle?
2007-09-12 03:57:08
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
First of all, your grammar is horrendous.
Second, atheists don't worship science.
Third, why should we assume some invisible deity made us? Why does that make more sense than saying we arose from millennia of evoultionary processes? I mean, thinking some spirit blew on a pile of dirt really makes sense to you?
And fourth, why assume it was God? Why not a purple fairy? Why not the Flying Spaghetti Monster?
2007-09-12 04:00:18
·
answer #9
·
answered by Cap'n Zeemboo 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
I don't claim that Science is God.
Atheists do not believe that there is a god.
Consequently, an atheist would not claim that anything is god.
I do however firmly believe that language is the intimately connected to thinking, and that if one is careless with language, one's thinking will inevitably be sloppy.
2007-09-12 03:59:11
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋