Seriously, why is evolution the only other alternative besides god? Evolutionists question the existence of god, so why can't atheists question the existence of The Big Bang, both of which take pure unaccompanied faith to exist.
2007-09-11 19:19:05 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
P.S. People that say with evolution is fact, have only arrogance to back their **** up.
2007-09-11 19:32:48 · update #1
What do you have to back up this question besides your narrow-minded ignorance and a foul mouth?
Big Bang theory has copious evidence to support it. God has none. That's why Big Bang theory is called SCIENCE. You may have heard of the concept of scientific theory. It's made certain hard to believe things possible, like flight and nuclear power.
Faith is belief in the ABSENCE of evidence, the exact opposite of scientific belief.
Time to go back to grammar school and study your vocabulary books little boy.
2007-09-11 19:45:52 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Actually, evolution and the Big Bang have extensive evidence, so faith is not required. I know some biologists, with whom I used to challenge evolution with over coffee. We were all looking for the great flaw that would get us a nice paper. We never found a hole that lasted until the next day. Of course, that was before a wealth of molecular data was available. There is no serious alternative to evolution. That's not faith -- that's library research. Our professor did not mock us for the pursuit, because we tested the theory of evolution, and it did result in one paper in a minor journal.
2007-09-12 03:15:12 · answer #2 · answered by novangelis 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Evolution is a scientific theory. Scientific theories are based on evidence that can be observed and tested. Evolution is the most controversial and most tested theory science has ever presented. The basic tenet that organisms have evolved through
natural selection and genetic mutations has not been proved false in the 100+ years since it was conceived. Until a viable alternative theory is created and proved superior then evolutionary theory is the only logical answer.
2007-09-11 19:46:40 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
What does the big bang have to do with evolution again?
And no, the big bang is a fact, just like evolution. Or maybe you have an alternative scientific theory nobody's heard yet, including an explanation for CMB radiation?
Yeah, thought so.
2007-09-11 19:28:51 · answer #4 · answered by Dreamstuff Entity 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Well lets see, why would you be looking at the Big Bang if you're questioning evolution.
If you're going to complain at least work out what it is you're complaining about...
As for the faith thing, if you have clear, unambiguous evidence avaiable to you, you don't need "faith" to understand and accept the explanation given. I mean, do you take a forensic police report as true based on faith? Faith in the forensics experts doing their job but besides that?
2007-09-11 21:22:45 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
We all got here somehow. So, if God doesn't exist, which is called atheism, then there has to be something to replace Him.
This replacement is called evolution. It created the whole universe.and constantly improves life for everyone. (sic)
So what I'm saying is that lots of atheists actually worship evolution. It's not just a theory to them, it's a way of life, and a comfort that everything will turn out all right.
Also like any religious people, they get really pissy when you question the existance of thier god.
2007-09-11 20:08:47 · answer #6 · answered by Jason R 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Evolution does not question the existence of God. They are two separate questions, one scientific and one theological or philosophical. Evolution and the origins of the universe are two scientific questions, one in biology and one in astrophysics or cosmology.
You are quite free to hypothesise alternative mechanisms for the origin of biological diversity, or for the beginnings of the universe. However, you will need evidence if you want to upgrade to "scientific theory".
And biologists (and cosmologists) don't mock people who ask genuine questions, only those who don't listen to the answers.
2007-09-11 19:28:04 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Evolution deals with the origin of species, not the origin of the universe. Questioning the big bang theory doesn't equate to questioning evolution.
2007-09-11 19:26:10 · answer #8 · answered by St John the Blasphemist 3 · 7⤊ 1⤋
The Big bang has evidence, there is nothing wrong with questioning it, but it is like questioning the theory of gravity.
2007-09-11 19:29:48 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Evolution and the big bang are completely different theories my friend.
2007-09-11 19:28:41 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋