or just pay the claim?
2007-09-11 14:36:41 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Hey south, I'm gonna wait to hear the answer to this one.
What a "great question" you asked. Bet the answer is "pay the claim?"
They'll never blame God. That would be they are admitting there is a God. Wow if they did. Prayers back in school.
2007-09-11 14:46:15 · answer #1 · answered by airlines charge for the seat. 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No,in insurance business atheists use natural disaster as a replacement of "Act of God",because they do not believe in God.They convince that this universe was not created by God.It occured as it is..Floods,earth quakes,storms etc are only a natural phenomenas
2007-09-11 15:03:11 · answer #2 · answered by ? 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
In contractual agreements and other legal documents, the phrase "Acts of God" doesn't refer to something done by a diety.
It refers to an event that is beyond human control - such as weather, earthquakes, hurricanes, etc...... It is an historical - if somewhat outdated - phrase that contractually covers anything not done by man.
2007-09-11 15:10:18 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, they call it an act of nature and chuckle as the "act of god" people pay up.
2007-09-11 14:43:04 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I'm agnostic and still would use the Act of God clause if it meant money for me.
2007-09-11 14:43:21 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't care what they want to call it. As long as I get my money, for the insurance that I paid for.
It's their words, not mine.
2007-09-11 14:55:28 · answer #6 · answered by Sapere Aude 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They don't write that into policies anymore.
2007-09-11 14:43:37 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
of course, if people are stupid enough to offer it I'll take it
2007-09-11 14:43:50 · answer #8 · answered by Jack 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
How clever. *insert sarcasm*
@>}----}----
AD
2007-09-11 14:49:35 · answer #9 · answered by AuroraDawn 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋