English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I'm 100% AGAINST it.

Build a fourteen foot wall.
Get a Fifteen foot ladder.

Stupid idea?

I think so.

I say make it cheaper and easier to get in and then it will be a peaceful place.

Where we can live in harmony.

2007-09-11 14:21:43 · 44 answers · asked by M. 4 in Politics & Government Immigration

Just no people with criminal pasts.

2007-09-11 14:22:22 · update #1

44 answers

"Intelinside" I disagree, I made a website for mexicans and the majority are totally clueless, they cant even download a free program from a free link with a huge flashing arrow pointing at it.
I don't care what the statistics say, those people don't behave like the Brits, Germans,French, Spaniards, Americans or Italians. I know because I have copies of all these sites in all these languages and I do TONS of testing and the Mexican traffic is absolutely clueless.

2007-09-11 14:46:32 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3 2

i think of you're complicated too many subjects along with your question. The Berlin wall divided a single u . s . a . into 2 countries. It did no longer seperate 2 very diverse countries or cultures. As to it working, the Berlin wall grow to be extremely helpful. ninety 8% of the persons who tried to pass it have been shot. That proves to be extremely a deterrent. Israel is a moot element additionally because of the fact the border partitions there are retaining a u . s . a . that the typical public of the voters interior the neighboring countries do no longer have confidence has a proper to exist. they have no interest in honoring the treaties that have been created to form Israel. there is not any longer something incorrect with the U. S. development a wall to guard the southern border as long as that's sufficiently guarded so as that that's in reality helpful. whether, there is fairly no element in development the wall except the U. S. additionally comes to a decision to grant extensive tax incentives to multi-national companies for increasing into Mexico and coming up greater jobs and opportunities down there so as that the voters will prefer to stay there to paintings. the biggest issues we've with immigration from the south is the socialist governments of the southern countries. All they're doing is coming up increasing poverty for their voters - in simple terms because of the fact the former Soviet Union did. Socialist policys create poverty. Healthcare and occasional-fee housing do no longer mean a element in case you need to stand in line to purchase bread. in simple terms ask the extreme-high quality persons in Cuba.

2016-11-15 00:01:01 · answer #2 · answered by piazza 4 · 0 0

For the Fence!
Make the 2000 mile even stronger than Israel's State of The Art Fence.
http://www.weneedafence.com

The Legal US Taxpayer spends $70B+ Dollars on Illegal Aliens every Year. The fence would cost around $8B-$20B when completed. That's quite an investment for future savings .

2007-09-11 14:43:03 · answer #3 · answered by Captain Tomak 6 · 3 0

I have a quick question for you mam.

You speak of harmony but yet go against your rationale by using the impossible disclaimer, "with no criminal history".

How on earth can we survey the millions of illegals, and do background checks on them in a legitimate manner.

For every ten decent, admirable, and humane immigrants, the one who will rape our children, or cause distress to our way of life to me is a risk i'm not willing to take.

There's a lawful way of doing things, and I believe a wall prevents that risk. We need to build it, especially when we are at war against terrorisim, and we can't afford to let the wrong people in this nation.

2007-09-12 22:29:07 · answer #4 · answered by A. Browning 1 · 0 1

We need legal immigration. Whatever is needed to stop the flow of illegals needs to be done. The definition of harmony is not having your country over run by whoever can walk across a border. Legal immigration has made this country great, not just allowing anyone in. And the good part about that 14' wall - it is a long ways to haul that 15' ladder. It is not the entire solution but it is part of a solution.

Many of you that are for the unrestrained flow of illegals also seem to think that Europe is the model for everything righteous in the world. Why not read some news and see how immigration is working in France.

2007-09-11 14:29:56 · answer #5 · answered by cliffemmert 1 · 6 3

FOR THE FENCE!

Your not serious about the Security of America if your against it.

Take a look at what the fence in San Diego looks like(thanks to Duncan Hunter) compared to what was there.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/1872940/posts



Here's a Duncan Hunter commercial with him walking along the fence in San Diego.
http://theduncanhunterblog.com/index.php/2007/05/18/duncan-hunter-commercial-on-the-border-fence/

This is the same type of double-fencing with a border patrol road in the middle that is being built as part of the Secure Fence Act of 2006.

The reason why people are against the "Fence" is because they know it will WORK!

2007-09-11 16:30:28 · answer #6 · answered by 4437 1 · 0 2

Honestly I'm against a fence only because I think it'll be a waste of money. Yes I agree we need to secure our borders but what is harder to get around a slab of concrete or a few trained guards with guns? I say hire more border patrol , we''ll be creatling more American jobs and our southern border will be secure. Besides a huge fence will take ages to build.

2007-09-11 14:44:06 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

Why should we be expected to pay Mexico's bills? Do you even understand all that money going back to Mexico allows the elite to live like Cesar's? If you believe Mexico is such a peaceful place why not go live there where your dreams can come true.Why would you stop at Mexico demand their walls come down too. Demand every country to allow even the bin laden's free access to anything they want.Demand all births from around the world be paid for by the American taxpayer. This way you can drain us dry.

2007-09-11 14:37:53 · answer #8 · answered by Untied States Of Latina 2 · 4 3

I'm against it. It would cost too much and basically be a feel-good measure that would have no actual effect on anything other than get the government votes by convincing people they are trying to do something. It would be about as effective as the Great Wall of China.

2007-09-11 14:51:25 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2 3

We already allow far too many people to migrate here legally. People ***** and cry about the possible threat of global warming.. but guess what? The guaranteed problems from overpopulation, at the current rate of immigration, is 100x worse.

But a border wall isn't anything more than a token answer to the problem. It won't work.

2007-09-11 14:31:12 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 4 3

fedest.com, questions and answers