Eyebrows were, of course, intellegentky designed to be raised when faced with questions such as this one.
2007-09-11 14:35:09
·
answer #1
·
answered by capekicks 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
Do you really think that most people actually have a thorough understanding of evolution? I know that I don't, but the fact that most scientists around the world accept evolution as a sound scientific theory is good enough for me. A bunch of people of Yahoo Answers contradicting each other about evolution, without any qualifications in the field hardly amounts to the theory being weak.
"Several thousand years ago, a small tribe of ignorant near-savages wrote various collections of myths, wild tales, lies, and gibberish. Over the centuries, these stories were embroidered, garbled, mutilated, and torn into small pieces that were then repeatedly shuffled. Finally, this material was badly translated into several languages successively. The resultant text, creationists feel, is the best guide to this complex and technical subject."
2007-09-11 14:38:34
·
answer #2
·
answered by qxzqxzqxz 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
Wow, did you ever make a leap with this one. Firstly you ask just anyone what their opinion was on the reason we have eyebrows, then since you get different answers, jump to the conclusion that therefore evolution is not possible and therefore God must have created it all. Obviously you have not ever seen the massive amounts of contradictions that religious people have over their own "religious" books. And what gets dropped and what should be followed. That would be more of a reason behind not believing in God, than your eyebrow thing not believing in evolution. Since we see adaption of living beings everyday, your theory (or lack there of) is null and void, and it puts huge support in evolution. There is empirical evidence in evolution, nothing for God.
2007-09-11 14:26:08
·
answer #3
·
answered by disturbed001500 2
·
3⤊
0⤋
How did evolution evolve? - One creature didn't die wherein a further did so it was once ready to breed wherein the one who died, did not. Very functional. Evidence, desire, notion or all 3? - What have they to do with whether or not one creature reproduces or now not. If truly proof was once used external of birds that look in combination - Look up ring species. Assume that I have honestly learn Darwin's "The Origin of Species - Try becoming a member of the twenty first century. Now if you'll be able to exhibit how evolution advanced, how did the evolution of evolution evolve? - That inspiration is ludicrous. One creature didn't die and reproduced wherein a further died. The genes that allowed it not to die had been propagated to the following iteration. do any of those causes turn out evolution is correct? - All of those that I have given you. If you are saying evolution is 'found out' & now not formulated, then it will have to have a few mathematical accuracy concerned - Life that was once ready to breed wherein different existence did not is what we "name" evolution. Make up any philosophical argument you wish, it does now not difference the truth that one creature higher ready to outlive will propagate their genes wherein the opposite does not. hundreds of thousands or billions in years isn't a measurable volume..this is a very gross estimate that quite method..."we aren't definite, and we use that given that we all know no person can confirm it." - You learn too many fundie captions. We can confirm it. I do not consider such a lot atheists have. - Probably now not in view that atheism is the attention that you simply, jointly, have in no way produced any proof of a deity. Evolution is biology. Look up the extraordinary phrases.
2016-09-05 10:45:04
·
answer #4
·
answered by mulock 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Many questions have more then 2 answers. Many questions the answer has not been found. Evolution can be true because you are talking about eyebrows here. We may not find the real reason, then again, Maybe we will.
2007-09-11 14:22:40
·
answer #5
·
answered by punch 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
First stop trying to do your, religious school homework on the Internet, we get it you have been brainwashed with intelligent design by your religious school, home school, or church.
Additionally why dont you do your own research. I know you probably don't know what a library looks like, but it has books in it, and they give the scientific reasons why evolution is fact, and intelligent design is garbage.
But if you persist in a there is no evolution, here is your simple answer god put them there to divert rain and water from getting in your eyes.
I am not going to give you any sources simply because I dont want you to plagiarize them in your paper.
2007-09-12 07:18:28
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Actually, the fact that eyebrows have multiple functions does not reduce the validity of evolution. A structure can develop as a survival advantage for one purpose, then acquire a second purpose that becomes the impetus for its preservation even after the first purpose becomes historical.
2007-09-12 02:59:56
·
answer #7
·
answered by novangelis 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Evolution is proven to be true by many different kinds of evidence. The fact that we don't yet know how a particular feature evolved does not detract from the fact that we are the products of evolution.
2007-09-11 14:22:57
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
0⤋
I'm not even reading the rest of your question .. b/c
1) If you want real answers .. and you are serious .. ask an anthropologist .. not average people on yahoo .. or go read some books on evolution.
2) Just b/c they *may* be a debate on *eyebrows* doesn't mean evolution doesn't exist .. evolution is not the *evolution of eye brows* lol ... evolution is EVERYTHING .. humans.. other species of animals.. plants .. bacteria .. not just eye brows
2007-09-11 14:24:16
·
answer #9
·
answered by nola_cajun 6
·
3⤊
0⤋
It doesn't mean that the theory of evolution is crap, it just means that there are certain details within the theory that we don't know yet. Exactly how eyebrows evolved is one of them.
2007-09-11 15:27:14
·
answer #10
·
answered by Jess H 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
There are contradictory theories in Creationism as well.
Some say dinosaurs never existed and fossils were put there by God to artificially age the Earth, while others say humans and dinosaurs actually existed side by side...does that alone mean Creationism is false?
2007-09-11 14:22:21
·
answer #11
·
answered by Daisy Indigo 6
·
5⤊
0⤋