English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

12 answers

For everyone who says YES, you need to educate yourself. My county gets about 3-7 % of the listed fine for each infraction written. The rest goes to the state to pay for crime victim funds, road repairs, special emphasis funding (seatbelt/DUI) etc. I have worked in several states and have never ever been given a quota to meet.

2007-09-11 14:37:17 · answer #1 · answered by Combatcop 5 · 0 1

Government is the servant of the people. They have no valid place "making law".

Your confused because you think it's the government that set those speed limits. It wasn't.

It was the corporation masquerading as the government.

You have the right to enter into contracts. You entered into a contract with the "Department of Motor Vehicles" when you applied for a "driver's license". Now you're obligated to fulfill your part of the contract, including obeying the entire "Vehicle Code".

Please notice the word "Code". This is not "Law", it is a "Code".

Government has the right to write "Code", but not "Law". The "People" wrote the law and elected public servants to carry it out. Those public servants then created the government corporation, made you believe you were obligated to contract with them. Once you did, you became obligated to obey the "Codes", "Statutes", "Ordinances" and "Regulations" they came up with.

Traveling is a God-given Constitutionally recognized and protected right. You don't need a "license" to travel, or to operate a private conveyance of any kind on public roadways. You just think you do.
.

2007-09-11 11:46:10 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Some places need speed limits. Do you think it would be OK to be able to do 60+mph in a school zone?

Speed cameras are a whole different issue

2007-09-11 11:37:38 · answer #3 · answered by Ferret 5 · 1 0

The reason for the current speed limit on freeways is lower fuel consumption. Cars are efficient at 55mph (for most vehicles) as the RPMs get hight over that cruzing speed gas consumption goes up goes up

2007-09-11 11:39:23 · answer #4 · answered by Howie 2 · 0 0

Speed limits are to protect the innocent people from the crazy ones who drive to fast for anyones good. It's not like they are unfair with what speed they post. Are you in that much of a hurry to get from point A to point B in a fast time? It will be there waiting for you .

2007-09-11 11:49:25 · answer #5 · answered by lynda 5 · 0 1

Absolutely. Police like nothing more than to screw people like you out of money. If I remember right, you get speeding tickets from speeding. Since neither the police or the sign make you speed, who is at fault here? If you do not break the law, there are no tickets. What are you 12?

P

2007-09-11 11:38:27 · answer #6 · answered by PK 4 · 2 1

Speed limits are for safety. Would you want someone driving down the street in front of your child's school, at 60 mph? I don't think so.

2007-09-11 11:38:01 · answer #7 · answered by regerugged 7 · 1 0

No, it's a guide to what speed is safe to drive. I wouldn't want people running 70mph down my street in the neighborhood.

2007-09-11 11:38:56 · answer #8 · answered by Glen B 6 · 1 0

Arguably to sell safer making use of, regrettably interior the direction of the common government implementation of concern. concern of a value tag, concern of better coverage costs, concern of loss of our suitable, sure, I did say that dreaded observe..suitable TO force. as a replace of charging those with a criminal offense purely whilst thier own habit actual does result the actual risk-free practices or rights of yet somebody else, we've purely made it unlawful to do something that would endanger or result the rights of yet another, which makes rushing technically a theory crime, very like conspiracy to commit homicide. in case you're overheard asserting your going to shoot the president of the US, you're concern to arrest and conviction. on the different hand in case you're instructed by ability of yet somebody else that they intend to kill you, you're predicted to handle it like a innocuous discern of speach, and not allowed to take any steps to look after your self. those velocity cameras artwork kinda like that, there is not any protection against them, and you through fact the owner of the automobile would possibly no longer even have been working it whilst the incident happened. as nicely that, the actuality that all of us is being caught by ability of those cameras is info that they do no longer surely shop us safer, in the event that they did, no person would velocity the place they see a variety of of of the truly obtrusive cameras located. kinda makes them purely yet another fund raiser, and as we did no longer ask for or approve them, they seem to be a sort of taxation devoid of illustration.

2016-11-10 04:11:03 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Yes. Government just wants money. Any way they can get it. Every time they can get it. We're at their mercy, yet it's "our" government. I want a do over.

2007-09-11 11:38:10 · answer #10 · answered by Flatpaw 7 · 2 2

fedest.com, questions and answers