Recently, Russian Air Forces tested the most powerful non-nuclear bomb ever made. Channel 1 shown its release from a Tu-160, called it "vacuum bomb", and compared its power with a small nuclear weapon.
2007-09-11 08:03:34 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Military
The military says its 20x more powerful than American "mother of all bombs", and calls it "father of all bombs".
2007-09-11 08:11:46 · update #1
No, they prevent wars. The only reason the US and USSR did not go to war because both sides knew there would be no winner.
PS
Russia has the most nukes, not the US
2007-09-11 09:10:06 · answer #1 · answered by Chris 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The USA has the most nukes and we keep war from breaking out by simply having them. So from an americans point of view no way.
2007-09-11 08:16:34 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Ha, got a link. The russians couldn't even put a man on the moon and when the cold war went on too long they folded like a cheap card table.
2007-09-11 08:24:13 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
I think that we Americans have too many Nukes and should reduce our overall number of nukes, by about two dozen. Then use those two dozen nukes on Iran.
2007-09-11 13:26:04 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
no we shouldn't if for no other reason than it makes the antiwar,environmentalist wackos and other left wing nut jobs mad that we have them.
2007-09-11 09:30:20 · answer #5 · answered by darrell m 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No way it will make us weak.
2007-09-11 08:21:27 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, how else can we totally destroy the planet?
2007-09-11 09:42:11 · answer #7 · answered by Steel Rain 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋