How come some many bodies were not discovered when the towers fell? How come all of the rubble was shipped off as soon as possible? And how come the towers fell when in previous structure test it shows that the building would have never fallen in the manner it did, with the circumstances that it happened? Has any one thought that all this was shipped off as soon as possible to cover up any evidence of Bombs implanted into the building? Is America so ignorant that they cannot see on all the videos showing the towers falling, that each floor, going down was exploding? It look just like a demolish en when they blow up the building they are tearing down. Did any one see the Larry King episode with the Fire fighters? Even they were saying the way the building fell was impossible for just the plane hitting them. And we all stand behind Bush and his war for Terrorism ... We are all off killing innocent people for what? Something Bush did. America the free and prisoner to bush.
2007-09-11 05:48:52 · 12 answers · asked by Carolyn 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
the "scraped up muck" should have been "cleaned" along time ago. I agree the people should be honored and the families , but this would have never happened iof the crooked government hadn't caused it to begin with. Bush Killed all those people, and we need to over throw him before he kills off any more. What about your family? You could be next!
2007-09-11 05:57:57 · update #1
Candace C Steel does not melt in open flames and if the theory of it weakening then collapsing is what they sticking with, why was there molten steel found even 3 weeks later.
Candace C unfortunately you are the ignorant one and today of all days is the best day to ask questions about what may have really happened. We have ignored this for too long.
2007-09-11 05:58:27 · answer #1 · answered by Edge Caliber 6 · 0⤊ 8⤋
"How come some many bodies were not discovered when the towers fell?"
Most were completely destroyed beyond recognition.
"How come all of the rubble was shipped off as soon as possible?"
You can't leave several destroyed buildings worth of material in the middle of Manhattan. All of that material carried the potential for contamination from decomposing bodies and the like, it needed to be moved ASAP.
"And how come the towers fell when in previous structure test it shows that the building would have never fallen in the manner it did, with the circumstances that it happened?"
Pathological cases do happen. The fact that the towers fell nearly straight down is suspect, however it is consistent with the explanation that the protective coating on the steel was removed at the impact, causing it to lose strength and eventually buckle under pressure.
"Is America so ignorant that they cannot see on all the videos showing the towers falling, that each floor, going down was exploding?"
I'm not convinced. Floors of a building pancaking down (which is clear from any footage) would produce the same image of material being ejected out of the building.
If there was a conspiracy by the government, do you not think they would just bomb the buildings? Consider that in 1993, terrorists tried to bomb the WTC from the underground parking garage. It would not be far-fetched to implement a conspiracy to do the same again. If this was the case, doing it this way would be much safer. Fewer cameras to capture the action, fewer witnesses. The way 9/11 unfolded, nearly every American was watching. If you were conspiring to take out a building, would you want that entire country watching?
2007-09-11 06:16:56 · answer #2 · answered by Pfo 7 · 4⤊ 0⤋
It amazing how all of you conspiracy people think that Bush is such a genius. Most of us normal people know Bush did not implode buildings and make planes and bodies disappear because we know Bush is not smart enough to do that.
No structure was ever tested to be able to stand up to a collision of a plane at 600 miles per hour.There was a great show on the History channel talking about all the conspiracies.you really should watch it next time its on, it might help you understand.
This one is not a conspiracy but still interesting, The construction of the Pentagon was started on 9-11-41
If it was not for F.D.R. the Pentagon would have been damaged much more. When they built it, it was planned to just be used during the war period, so he insisted it be built twice as strong as a normal building so it can use used to store national archives later. With the structure being twice as strong as other buildings, the Pentagon held up pretty well against a speeding plane
2007-09-11 07:26:56 · answer #3 · answered by Michael G 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
This has been done and explored and talked to death. They fell due to the way the planes hit and the intense head generated by thousands of gallons of exploding rocket fuel!
No matter what your conspiracy theories - today remains a day that should be devoted to honoring the heroes of that day - all the innocents who lost their lives, the families who lost their loved ones, the emergency crews who risked their own lives in the hope they would save just one person, and the brave armed forces who stand every day in this war in hope that their actions ensure we don't have another 9/11.
2007-09-11 05:59:41 · answer #4 · answered by rose1077 4 · 7⤊ 0⤋
what's a "debatable" witness? If the guy incredibly observed the activities, or had complete get admission to to the activities as they have been unfolding, then they're in straightforward terms debatable if the activities they're reporting are in direct conflict with the actual tale of the form. interior the form of an interior activity and credible witnesses with annoying data that proves the interior activity, then each attempt would be made to discredit them which includes termination. If we've been advised the reality, then the deaths of non-believers is strictly twist of fate. we will not in any respect be attentive to the reality till long after it incredibly is not proper anymore, so like JFK, we are only going to could stay with the data and any mistrust of persons in contact.
2016-10-10 09:23:55 · answer #5 · answered by czaplicki 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I can turn around and call you ignorant, citing the myriad scientific sources on how the towers fall, and you can do the same to me.
If you want people to see your point of view, don't call them ignorant. Don't call them dumb or use harsh terms. Post sources, speak intelligently (not emotionally), and maybe people will see your way.
And we are not killing innocent people. Other people are doing that, and we're not doing a 100% job of protecting people.
2007-09-11 05:59:16 · answer #6 · answered by K 5 · 4⤊ 0⤋
If you do some research, then you would know the towers collapsed due to the intense heat from the jet fuel fires. Today is not a day to rake up old muck! It is a day to honor the fallen and the heroes. We all need to show some respect for the families of these people.
2007-09-11 05:55:31 · answer #7 · answered by Candace C 5 · 12⤊ 2⤋
On this International Day of Freedom, your question is not worthy to answer. But then again, I guess you are free to ask such dishonoring questions.
2007-09-11 06:27:34 · answer #8 · answered by Scotty 2 · 4⤊ 0⤋
I know I will not get best answer for this one,
but maybe if you actually read the Popular Mechanics article, you would understand thebasic physics involved.
2007-09-11 06:46:57 · answer #9 · answered by lundstroms2004 6 · 5⤊ 1⤋
is the rest of your life spent thinking loser ideas like this?
2007-09-11 06:10:22 · answer #10 · answered by John C 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋