maybe vote them out in 2008?
I have heard nothing but false accusations,and treasonous slander from this group. I am tired of hearing them call everyone that is trying to fight terrorists a liar, when not one democrat has ever done anything to fight terrorism. Clinton especially permitted the WTC bombing in 1993 without punishment, the USS Cole bombing and other bombings of embassies around the world, refused to take Osama bin laden when he was apprehended, and for human rights, intentionally ignored the Sudan crisis.
2007-09-11 05:13:03 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Military
I wouldn't say that NO democrat helps this nation in the war against terror. I work with some very GOOD democrats as well.
What I am dismayed about is extremism. The very same people who reserve the right to say whatever they want about the military RELY solely upon the freedom of speech assured to them BY the military.... It's almost as if singing freedom of speech should give them the right to say whatever they want.
The part that is worse, however, is that they fire the guns at General Petraeus before he is even given his right to free speech, slandering his good and honorable name after he's given decades of his life in service... and for what? political gain and the fear that he MIGHT say something they don't like.
2007-09-11 05:31:30 · answer #1 · answered by promethius9594 6 · 5⤊ 1⤋
Does it fairly count? that may no longer a bipartisan war. Any question (inspite of party association) that improve into asked improve into to make certain if: a million. Is there adequate progression to justify the shortcoming of yank lives and money? 2. How long will it take (if ever) to make certain a democratic Iraq? 3. Why is there one in each of those enormous discrepency in what Gen Petraeus comments & what the BBC & different international companies checklist? Why does the national Intelligence Estimate & the final duty place of work information no longer jive with the Petraeus & Crocker comments? Why does the UN's checklist on the form of Iraqi civilian casualties & Gen Petraeus checklist no longer even come close? Is it via fact there are new regulations for counting the # of lifeless? Like in the event that they are shot interior the back of the top it gets counted as an insurgents bullet yet whilst it extremely is a frontal shot this is not counted? How reduculous!! Who cares who's asking the questions? What I care the main approximately is that the acceptable questions are asked & that Petraeus solutions certainly!! i think of between the main severe questions improve into asked via John Warner, a Republican. Does our involvement in Iraq make make the US greater secure? the respond via Petraeus improve into "i do no longer understand". Now you tell me, if he does not understand, who does? i'm able to call 3 that I observed during the thinking-Kerry, Webb & Biden.
2016-10-04 09:26:21 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The absolutely terrifying thing is that the Democrats are setting a precedent where they will punish any general who gives his honest opinion.
And if you think about it - the Democrats are slandering a man - who on his worst day - is a better man than they can ever hope to be. Maybe this is why they hate him so much.
2007-09-11 06:42:23 · answer #3 · answered by MikeGolf 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
The cure is to have them drop their purses (men too ) hand them a weapon and move them out to a front line so they can assimulate a answer for themselves, if the one that is given to them is not to their liking! You arm chair warriors, keyboard commandos talk a MEAN go of it but really.....You would rather have someone else do your fighting for you,HUH? No matter who gets whacked ..... as long as it ain't YOU? GUTLESS WONDERS!! You don't deserve the right bestowed on you by the Brave Few who guard the gates at night while you sleep.
Stand your ground you sniveling cowards while you still have a ground to stand on that is paid in full by the very people you loathe. I don't care what YOUR beliefs are:
FREEDOM IS NOT FREE !!!!!
2007-09-11 05:42:35 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
erhm, bush is intentionally ignoring the sudan crisis RIGHT NOW... there is a genocide going on there and he's refusing to act.
Also Iraq did not perpetrate any terrorists acts against America (no links were found between them and al queda), so technically general petraeus and the current goverment currently is not fighting terrorism either...
(although they did in afghanistan admittedly)
2007-09-11 05:26:08 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Vote them out in 2008...
2007-09-11 05:43:31 · answer #6 · answered by Marco R 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
There is no cure. We can only hope patiotic Americans do what only we can: vote the bums OUT. Let them know we do not appreciate their lack of courtesy, ethics and love of country.
2007-09-11 05:24:51 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
VOTE THE DEMOCRAT PARTY OUT IN 2008!!
2007-09-11 05:22:08 · answer #8 · answered by Vagabond5879 7 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Pay attention to the issues and how your representatives are voting. E-mail their offices, and vote.......
2007-09-11 07:47:30 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
The loss of our votes.
2007-09-11 05:22:19 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋