"I want to take you out to lunch" means you'll pay.
"Want to meet for lunch?" means you go dutch unless otherwise noted.
2007-09-11 05:24:55
·
answer #1
·
answered by Terri 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
There is a difference between asking someone to "meet" for lunch and "take" you to lunch. But either way, I would not assume anything. Plan on paying for your own and if she then insists on paying for you, great!
2007-09-11 02:56:43
·
answer #2
·
answered by jkc 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes, if someone asks me if I wanted to meet for lunch I assume that we are each paying our way. Only when someone says that they want to take me to lunch do I assume that they are paying for my lunch. In my office, we take others out to lunch for their birthday. My boss will treat me and my coworker to lunch if she's been out of the office for a while on business and we've done a good job holding the fort down.
2007-09-11 02:59:31
·
answer #3
·
answered by Not quite perfect 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
If someone says, "I would like to take you to lunch" I would think that would mean they are paying. However, it's always best not to assume so I would make sure that I had enough money to pay for my own lunch just in case.
2007-09-11 02:52:07
·
answer #4
·
answered by junebug 6
·
3⤊
0⤋
I don't. Welfare fraud isn't rampant.....people just complain often and loud about the few people who do use the system fraudulently. More than 90% of welfare recipients are temporary, are in legitimate need, and are actively seeking gainful employment. It's the other 10% that need to be reported. Unfortunately, that 10% makes some people so angry that, instead of reporting them, these angry people attack and criticize ALL welfare recipients as 'welfare thugs' and 'welfare hos'. Obviously, if we could get all of these angry people to actually report the problem cases, there would be little reason to complain about welfare in this nation (outside of corporate welfare). Unfortunately, you will find that welfare is an easy target.....and people LIKE to have poor people as a target. If there were zero cases of fraud, then that would make it much more difficult to criticize and attack a program that helps millions in legitimate need. So, by focusing on that 10%...as though they represent the majority, it makes their case stronger. My 3 foster children have been on 'welfare' for 2 years...and will be on welfare through the age of 5. They are not lazy, they are not losers, they are not 'thugs' or 'hos'. They are children who's parents couldn't care for them...who have no other means of support. There are 3 million children in foster care in this nation. Without WIC and Medicaid, we couldn't have afforded to take them in and provide them a home and family. We pay for all other expenses.
2016-04-04 01:51:53
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Choose your invitation carefully. Meeting for lunch and saying I would like to take you to lunch are two different things. Meeting for lunch, you ask for separate checks. I want to take you implies you are paying. Settle the matter up front.
2007-09-11 04:29:10
·
answer #6
·
answered by dawnb 7
·
3⤊
0⤋
Usually if I plan on paying for my friend's lunch I'll tell her that I want to treat her to lunch. If I don't plan on paying, I'll just ask her if she wants to go out for lunch together.
2007-09-11 02:52:07
·
answer #7
·
answered by emily1980 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
If you say "I would like to take you to lunch", that means you would pay. If you say "Hey, let's go have lunch somewhere" or "Hey, let's get together for lunch", then I would assume you each pay for yourselves.
When you offer to TAKE someone, you pay.
2007-09-11 03:25:27
·
answer #8
·
answered by startwinkle05 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
It is not understood, it only becomes clear when either of you asks the wait staff for separate checks for your meals. Enjoy lunch!!
2007-09-11 02:39:29
·
answer #9
·
answered by Mawia 7
·
2⤊
1⤋
telling someone you'd like to take them to lunch means, you'll pay.
asking someone to meet up means, it's dutch
2007-09-11 04:45:03
·
answer #10
·
answered by racer 51 7
·
1⤊
0⤋