English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

meeting to people is ban. why do JW want other there the bible. do you think there are right.

2007-09-11 02:03:56 · 9 answers · asked by John 4 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

why is jw meeting to people

2007-09-11 02:25:56 · update #1

9 answers

you check with
http//:www.state.gov/g/dri/ris/ief/2004/35427.htm
International Religous freedom 2004

2007-09-11 03:21:03 · answer #1 · answered by peter 1 · 1 0

This is extremely hard to figure out. Where is it banned? Under what conditions? It seems we have the Jehovah's Witnesses on the one hand, who feel obligated to proselytize their religion, and everyone else on the other, who feel harassed and would rather not have them coming to their door and pestering them with witnessing in all sorts of public places.

But I don't know as I've ever lived somewhere where it was banned.

I think it should be banned on military posts and other government (state as well as federal) installations, however, as part of the separation of church and state. To permit such proselytizing by one group is to be forced to permit it by any group, and too much dissension would result. Otherwise, if one group is permitted and others are not (or even if they just don't want to), then that is the government favoring one religion over others. That is not permitted by the First Amendment.

And remember that just as zero is a number, atheism must be counted as protected under the freedom of religion.

2007-09-11 02:10:33 · answer #2 · answered by auntb93 7 · 1 0

EDIT
Ok, JW's are commanded in the Bible to preach the Good News of the Kingdom of God.
As shown in the Bible, one method is by door to door.

Most churches in the US want their sheep to go door to door, house to house with a spiritual message. JW's are the only ones that are successful with it.

Act 20:20 how I shrank not from declaring unto you anything that was profitable, and teaching you publicly, and from house to house,

2007-09-11 02:20:34 · answer #3 · answered by rangedog 7 · 0 0

No, they do no longer seem to be banned from the internet. they are purely banned from examining 'apostate propaganda'. the authentic threat to the Society from apostates isn't in the lies they tell, yet in the truths they tell that are actually made easily researchable by using the WT cd-rom and the internet. questions approximately inconsistencies, defective reasonings, misrepresentations of previous historic previous, doctrinal turn-flops, psychological dishonesty and pseudo-scholarship are a number of the topic concerns the Society now faces from members who're now waiting to study for themselves Watchtower guides that have lengthy been out of print. This previous twelve months the WT Society efficiently close down a Canadian internet site observed as "fees" which grew to become into totally quotations from Watchtower guides. you will possibly think of that because of the fact the Society encourages the distribution of their literature, that this might purely be a touch better help in spreading their observe. So why did they close it down? of their own words, they sued because of the fact they suggested it grew to become into the reason of the internet internet site to "embarrass" them. Now why might they be embarrassed? anybody who observed the internet internet site might understand why.

2016-12-26 06:11:39 · answer #4 · answered by ? 3 · 0 0

It's a practice of their religion, meeting people to ban i don't know what your asking, we have a freedom of religion in the US well that's what they tell us.

2007-09-11 02:07:52 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

meeting in people in singapore is ban.

2007-09-11 02:44:38 · answer #6 · answered by Jonathan M 2 · 1 0

Go back to school til you can write a comprehensible statement or question.

2007-09-11 02:06:59 · answer #7 · answered by Keltasia 6 · 1 0

How many verbs do you need in one sentence?

2007-09-11 02:24:49 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

STOP TAKING DRUGS! WHAT THE HELL ARE YOU TRYING TO SAY?

2007-09-11 02:17:49 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers