English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-09-10 14:36:57 · 25 answers · asked by universatile love 3 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

Maxmom.....exactly!!!
Funny your comment is so relavant to religion and the books written by man and called books of God, all of them.

2007-09-11 19:09:17 · update #1

25 answers

What a heretic question.
As everybody knows religious tradition tells us: none.
Jesus though was a rebel, a resistance fighter as we may call him today.
Read Dostojewskis "Brothers Karamasow". The passage about the return of Jesus tells everything.
Jesus was human after all. It is most plausible that he made use of his body as everybody did.
As Jesus was suffering spiritual and mental pain as normal people, it is only logical that he also had carnal experiences.
Yours -
http://www.joemessiah.com

2007-09-10 14:47:29 · answer #1 · answered by absolutelyBangkok.com 2 · 1 4

I can not believe that anyone would believe this tripe.

First, IF Christ had been inclined to marriage, he would have done it in the normal course of his culture between the age of 13 and twenty. Since Christ was a skilled tradesman who apprenticed under his father he probably would have married after his apprenticeship was finished and he was recognized as a Master Builder (tekton).

That still has him being married between twenty and twenty three, not thirty something.

Being a Devout Jew of the Davidic line through both Mary and Joseph he would probably have married a single wife which he would have considered to be his "lost rib". Marrying another would have taken someone else's rib from them. If his wife had died, the likelihood that he would have married anyone else is near zero.

This would be an appropriate marriage theory for any man in the culture and times of Christ.

The Mary Magdalene story is so unlikely as to be ridiculous to anyone who has actually studied the times and culture.

Dan Browns assertion that the Jews loved Jesus so much that they interred Mary under their previously destroyed Holy of Holies is even more ludicrous to anyone with an education.

Unless, you are trying to pick up a pretty co-ed at a party. Then.....hey some people will believe anything and some people will say anything under the right conditions.

2007-09-10 14:59:17 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

I think everyone down deep knows the answer to this but hardened hearts love to ffollow fables, myths, and legends. What if it were the other way around? What if the evidence of Jesus having no children was of the same weight and substance of the evidence that He actually had children. Can you imagine the amount of faith bashing, and accusations of simple minded Christians there would exist. Now, we actually have evidence based on eyewitness testimony by His closest followers with no agenda, who didn't even believe He rose again in spite of the fact that Jesus Himself predicted it to their face, that He had no children because He was born to be Savior and Lord to all who trust Him because He showed up on the human scene to die for our sin. He didn't show up on the scene to be family man in the natural sense. He did come to adopt natural born rejectors into spritually reborn members of His spiritual family and give them a loving relationship with God instead of being subject to His wrath. He came to shed His blood for our sin, not to establish a blood line to the French kingly throne. Come on folks, if the shoe was on the other foot, you would have a lot of amunition, but now you have only paper bullets.

2007-09-10 14:53:57 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

Zilch. Mary Magdalene was Mary's (mother of Jesus)lover. They were together at the foot of the cross when Jesus was dying. A good place for a lover don't you agree?

2007-09-10 14:42:45 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

None. Did the bible say that they had any children together? Did the bible say that they was married or were lovers? Maybe you better ask God that question and wait for your answer! Some questions are best to be left alone especially if they don't make sense.

2007-09-10 14:45:04 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2 3

why do you think that they had children? did you have a dream in which Nostrodamus told you so? did you read it on the internet at a Raelian web site? read a book written by a mushroom smoker that read it in the akashic records? maybe you ate too many of Cheech's brownies.

2007-09-10 14:43:02 · answer #6 · answered by poetsinger 2 · 2 3

Are you referring to references made in a popular and entertaining book of fiction?

It's pretty sad when a fiction writer can't write a book without it becoming "fact" in some delusional minds...

2007-09-10 14:46:40 · answer #7 · answered by maxmom 7 · 2 3

Since there wasn't any birth control back then God only knows how many kids they had. That is if you want to assume that Jesus was real.

2007-09-10 14:42:01 · answer #8 · answered by MyMichelle 4 · 2 4

I stand corrected

3

a daughter named Tamar
a son born 4 years later Jesus
a son born 7 years later Joseph (the grail)

She married Jesus when she was 27 and gave birth to her last child Joseph at age 41

and Jesus was also married again after Mary to Lydia

http://www.paralumun.com/jesusmarr.htm


This was around long before the Davinci Code.

There is a whole family that are the descendants of Jesus and mary M

The Plantards

2007-09-10 14:40:19 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2 8

Blasphemy will not get you any closer to heaven! Quit listen to the modern day scientologists.
Dominus Vobiscum
Don

2007-09-10 14:43:12 · answer #10 · answered by msrtampa04 2 · 1 4

fedest.com, questions and answers