2007-09-10 14:36:07 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
There are none, sorry.
2007-09-10 14:38:51 · answer #1 · answered by ChooseRealityPLEASE 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Neither evolution nor creationism has ever been fully proven to be correct. creationism is based on faith more then proof. evolution is only based on what you can prove. But without proof how are you going to be able to say that evolution is correct? Have they found the 2 celled organism that came from the single cell? you cant just all of the sudden get a human from a single cell...so obviously without the existence of the bicellular organism you can not prove we have evolved from a single cell. The only real explaination would have to be creationism since it is the belief of life just being created. Thus you can incorporate both. God created the single cell organism. AND God created man to rule over it all. There is a section in the Bible that explains the presence of dinosaurs, how would people at that time even think up something so complex and be able to describe it to a T? Science can not fully tell when something died or how old it really is. Until they can do that and have it be exact the only thing that would make life on Earth possible is creationism.
2007-09-14 13:31:11 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Obviously there is no scientific proof that God did it. But there is a growing body of evidence that supports a recent creation and a worldwide flood. The radio halos in Precambrian granite still remain irrefutable. A new study has been recently published by the Institute for Creation Research on radiometric dating, called the RATE project. It's loaded with good arguments. I like to consider the polystrate fossils for flood evidence. Read The Genesis Flood by Dr. Henry Morris.
2007-09-10 21:46:40 · answer #3 · answered by John 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Doesn't science state that things, if left alone, naturally go from a more complex state to a less complex state? For example, an apple left out for days, will rot & decay. A rotting apple does not turn into a fresh, new fruit. An old car rusts: it doesn't turn into a new car. How then would a single cell evolve, on its own, into a ridiculously complex series of evolutionary stepping-stones to result in a human being. If that did happen, how would it have just so happened to turn the corner from asexual reproduction to sexual reproduction, and for what sound reason? Also, how could evolution in such a way account for a simultaneous departure in two different directions -- male & female, with it making any sense or being successful, if unguided and totally given to chance & timing? However, it is very possible that humans can clone a sheep, now. It is also true that a real & living God, far greater & more advanced than us, created man & then created a woman from man's rib. He made us in His image so that we may hopefully perceive that we ought to chose to become more like Him, as a child imitates his father.
2007-09-10 21:50:22 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
The universe is not dropped quarters. That's funny. I have never heard anything that made sense from a scientific point of view for creation Science. There are multiple universes. That's been proved. Really.
And the other one doesn't really know about fossils.
2007-09-10 21:45:28 · answer #5 · answered by punch 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Rational Arguments in favour of "Creation Science" - there cannot be one. It is based on a myth.
As for Poetsinger - the web pages are arguments against evolution in the current state of study - not an argument for creationalism. they are not the same thing. if we reject evolution then we have hundreds of creation myths - all equally as valid.
It is luck that actually, the guy in the articals is making mountings out of molehills.
2007-09-10 21:42:55 · answer #6 · answered by Freethinking Liberal 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
If the
Mississippi delta took only a few thousand years to form.
where did Americas erosion sediment end up if the continent is supposed to be many millions of years old?
2007-09-10 21:42:27 · answer #7 · answered by kevin s 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
creation science exists because most people, even creationists, respect science enough to want to pretend that their beliefs are not in conflict with it. as with so many things in this modern world, it's all style and no substance.
2007-09-10 21:48:18 · answer #8 · answered by vorenhutz 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
you're kidding, right?
represent: " But if you went down the street and saw one hundred quarters on the sidewalk and they were all carefully balanced precariously on their edges, you would have to think somebody did this deliberately. The Universe as we know it, is that carefully balanced. This theory is known as the Strong Anthropic Principle."
who says the universe is balanced? when it's like one big as$ storm?
2007-09-10 21:40:43 · answer #9 · answered by Pisces 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
There is none ,God did not mess with science.
2007-09-10 21:44:22 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Thus far the best one is, someone said so.
2007-09-10 21:40:50 · answer #11 · answered by liberty11235 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋