Creation scientists have found the key to proving intelligent design- the talking snake in Genesis! Snakes today have no vocal cords- that proves evilution never happened! Yes, this proves without a doubt that snakes were created by God- otherwise how could they talk?
9 out of 10 creation scientists agree that the Garden of Eden is somewhere in Africa where these talking snakes lived. Why? Because the account of the Garden in Genesis sounds remarkably like some footage I saw in a National Geographic documentary one time. That proves that Africa was once populated with talking snakes. Defy that logic, EVILUTIONISTS!
Creation scientists agree that snakes lost their vocal cords when they lost their legs sometime between 8000 and 7800 B.C. That proves that God punished the snakes for tempting Eve in the Garden of Eden- that's why there are no more talking snakes! It's undeniable proof!
What do you have to say about this astounding proof of intelligent design, you silly atheists?!
2007-09-10 13:02:44 · 17 answers · asked by lindsey p 5 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
For goodness sakes, get a grip.
2007-09-10 13:08:55 · answer #1 · answered by Faye 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
How do you already know people with extra noxious scent have not been phased out by means of the years? in keeping with probability they have been. the belief is unwarranted and lacks data. Plus, the noxiousness of the odors relies upon on the eating recurring ingested. Diets have replaced too a great deal for evolution to have an consequence, assuming noxious odors inhibit replica.
2016-12-16 16:51:03 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
so why are you making up questions you don't believe in to bait Christians? stating "9 out of 10 creation scientists" is just silly, especially when you cite no source for your info. I'm guessing you are just mocking Christians. do you feel better now for having done that?
2007-09-10 13:34:38 · answer #3 · answered by poetsinger 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
umm lets be more open ended i mean theres a lot more proof of evolution than creationism and how would scientist no when snakes lost there vocal cords
2007-09-10 13:08:54 · answer #4 · answered by Brian 3 · 0⤊ 3⤋
That's a great point, but I still prefer Windom Earle's versions too.
-Evilutionist
2007-09-10 13:14:21 · answer #5 · answered by eV 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
The fact that GWB is dumber than an orang-utang is proof against evolution. LOL!!
2007-09-10 13:13:13 · answer #6 · answered by mattgo64 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Oh shucks, this information has now turned me from Creationism to Evolution!! lol ;-)
Pastor John
2007-09-10 13:15:00 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Oh Lindsey, Lindsey, Lindsey... How could I have not seen it before! You've opened my eyes to the bright bright light of creation!
2007-09-10 13:09:06 · answer #8 · answered by Ayana 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
I've seen the light! I'm renouncing my evil atheistic ways immediately!
2007-09-10 13:07:45 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Nice one, Lindsey!! Why do I always fall for this?
You get me every time.
2007-09-10 13:41:57 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋