Step. Away. From. The. Ballot. Box.
2007-09-10 07:39:54
·
answer #1
·
answered by HooliganGrrl 5
·
30⤊
2⤋
Scientists could have been right if they only said that from the primary stage of human intellectual development in the early lives of people, that we have acted like those of the monkeys as a form of survival on earth. I also cannot accept that theory.
The Bible however cannot also be used as the literal and clear way to understand creation. God in the book was presented like a carpenter who shaped everything. Human development may also be like the seeds that grow into trees and not a tree that was already there just as how it described the creation of Adam. There must be something that science could have emphasized better in the process of evolution rather than fix their findings from the monkeys when it comes to human development. We did not exactly come from the monkeys.
2007-09-10 07:57:07
·
answer #2
·
answered by Rallie Florencio C 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
just because people bark up the wrong tree doesn't mean there isn't a squirrel up the tree next to it.
The problem with the dummies trying to explain evolution is the seem to work on the same principles that the christians use in the bible.. no evidence... (like the big bang or the evolution of humans) true science is the observation of nature so they should limit themselves to what they can observe not to theorize what occur when no one could possibly have observed.
looking at the plant life and the insect world, there are many of their evolutionairy stages still alive at the same time.
2007-09-10 08:14:15
·
answer #3
·
answered by NO Labels 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Why do you think I'm a liberal? I'm somewhere between conservative and libertarian.
Why do you think anyone says we evolved from monkeys? You're just showing your ignorance of evolutionary theory.
Why do you think it matters what some ancient book says about origins? You realize that there have been dozens of creation stories throughout history, and hundreds of gods involved in those creations, right?
So evolution makes no sense, but having some invisible being blow on a pile of dirt to create human beings *does.* Yeah, gotcha.
2007-09-10 07:46:36
·
answer #4
·
answered by Cap'n Zeemboo 3
·
2⤊
0⤋
Being liberal has nothing to do with it, having an IQ over 70 does. Many religious people of all religions accept evolution, the debate was over long ago. We have many transitional fossils from several global climate periods, can see evolution happening with simple specimens in both the lab and in controlled nature situations, it's really not worth talking about.
Unless by the double negative at the end this was all a joke, in that case, I've seen better:)
2007-09-10 07:44:11
·
answer #5
·
answered by Starvin' Marvin 3
·
5⤊
0⤋
lol!
Clearly you dont understand evolution - it does not state that humans evolved from monkeys.
Try reading real books sometime. Theres an amazing amount of real info out there, once you put away the childrens fairy tales of noah and his impossible ark, talking mules and jesus the magic zombie.
Though if those things make sense to you, and reality doesnt, you may have major psychological problems.
2007-09-10 08:35:00
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Actually, if you believe in evolution, then you believe that life evolved on this planet through a billion year process, and all life started as independent extremely simple life forms that were created through a unique combination of chemical and evironmental states.
Monkey's, on the other hand, are simply delicious.
Bucky
2007-09-10 07:47:38
·
answer #7
·
answered by Night Owl 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
yet why could what's written interior the bible be by way of? i do no longer fake to declare that each and everything this is written interior the bible isn't by way of yet individually i think of creationism is completely a narrative for infants, a solid ethical. whether this is in no way a solid explanation of ways guy grow to be created, this is purely a narrative. All religions had some variations of human advent, how are you able to've the pretension to declare the christian version is the by way of. For me living outdoors the united statesA. .I felt completely revolted as quickly as I observed a bunch of massive fat preachers attempting to transform Thai people interior the line whilst i grow to be on shuttle there. individually I grew up in a christian ecosystem, I in simple terms discovered ll the rituals ridiculous, like all perception in some thing dogmatic that pretend to comprehend each and everything. this has been designed to manage people. this is spectacular that some people nonetheless have confidence in this. i think of this is purely a loss of intelligence or optimistically coaching.
2016-11-14 21:00:12
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well, surely there are Monks, so then there must be monkeys, so then which came first the Monk or the monkey?
Figured that out and I'm not even a liberal.
Evolution is like comparing apples to Orangutans, some things just don't fit.
2007-09-10 07:45:01
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
#1. "liberal" i believe is generally a political term, not a religous one.
#2. The Bible is a religious book. It is not a science book.
#3. Not everyone is Christian (or Islamic, or Jewish, for that matter).
#4. Some people seem to have difficulty with the concept of metaphor.
#5. Science tells us how. Religion tells us who.
2007-09-10 07:43:14
·
answer #10
·
answered by vireonefer 2
·
2⤊
1⤋
The Bible alss mentions 2 completely different creations of "man" one of the spirit and one of the Earth.Native American legends as well as many cultures also say this. Not all of us came from the same place.
2007-09-10 07:41:54
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋