2007-09-10 05:43:28 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
I think that there would be tendency for sexual ambiguity but I think that nature would take root in a majority and still produce a majority of heterosexuals.
2007-09-10 05:47:55 · answer #1 · answered by doorofperception13 2 · 3⤊ 0⤋
I don't think so. There are lots of historical societies where bi sexuality was common practice. In many if not most of these areas the local religion is the forum which gerulates what is "moral" and immoral behavior. Because religion is largely a human construct it responds to local influences. Religion is a method for societies to distribute the information of moral norms. That the religions began to forbid homosexuality reflects the society turning away this behavior. In early societies I can imagine this being due to reproductive needs. A society engaged in pleasureable sex rather than procreation will die out so the local religion will proscribe reproductive sex only.
2007-09-10 13:21:39 · answer #2 · answered by joshbl74 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Most humans probably are bisexual anyway. Religion is not an independent force anyway, as people like to pretend. Instead every society or culture develops the kind of religious beliefs that fits its needs and prejudices, as shown long ago by the French scholar Durkheim. If a society choose for whatever reason to stigmatize bisexuality, it will develop religious beliefs to justify that.
2007-09-10 12:50:35 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
You didn't describe your line of reason . What would cause people to be bisexual without religion ? So far as we know, animals do not have religions , but they are not bisexual .
I think you're way off base. Using myself - - I'm one hundred percent non-religious , but I'm sure not interested in punking anyone, or having anyone punk me.
2007-09-10 12:51:05 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I don't think so. I think that who you're attracted to is inherent, and isn't necessarily subject to (or the result of) religious beliefs.
For example, I don't have a problem with homosexuality or bisexuality, but I have no interest in actually being with another woman. So even without religious constraints, I am still heterosexual.
2007-09-10 12:50:54 · answer #5 · answered by Nandina (Bunny Slipper Goddess) 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I am Bi and I am a Christian. Why would it take that in order to make a person think a certain way? The thing that the Gays and such are leaning on is that they were born that way. If so, then there are people who were born straight. It works both ways.
2007-09-10 12:55:02 · answer #6 · answered by Christian Sinner 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
i have no desire whatsoever to be with a woman, and it has nothing to do with any religion. I simply find the idea disgusting when i think what sort of thing you'd have to do to pleasure her....yuck!
2007-09-10 13:28:12 · answer #7 · answered by robin s 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Is some religion holding you back?
2007-09-10 12:51:13 · answer #8 · answered by Handy man 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I doubt it -- I don't think an inordinate number of agnostics or atheists are bisexual.
2007-09-10 12:47:16 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 0⤋
No. For must people it is natural to like the other gender.
2007-09-10 12:48:36 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋