According to news sources, the Democrats were asked "why did they support a fence along the Mexican border but not the Canadian border" during tonights "suck up to the illegal aliens event." Can anyone guess as to why we have a need for a fence on the Mexican border but not the Canadian? I'll give you a hint. Which country has illegally dumped nearly 10% of their uneducation population in this country while the other hasn't. Take a wild guess for 10 easy points.
2007-09-09 21:52:48 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Immigration
Spelling and grammatical errors happen. I've been up all night. If you don't get my point, don't answer.
2007-09-09 22:19:09 · update #1
jojo:
You opened your mouth, so put up. What makes me a biggot? The facthat I'm against illegal immigration? Thefact that Mexico has dumped 10% of their uneducated on this country? Come on, I'm sick of people like you who are quick to label me because I'm against illegal immigration. I have an Asian wife. Her and her family waited 5 1/2 years for their turn. What makes Mexican's different?
2007-09-09 22:23:26 · update #2
Sorry for the spelling errors.
2007-09-09 22:25:29 · update #3
Here's another good one:
"Kucinich was again an audience favorite when he said he would make Spanish a second national language. But no leading candidate was willing to go that far."
I'm totally against this. So is my English as a Second Language wife. I'll be that also makes us biggots.
2007-09-09 22:27:48 · update #4
madpol1:
The military hospitals are a dump. However, you can't blame that just on President Bush. I had surgery in Walter Reed in 1985 and the place was seriously in need of maintenance back then. The neglect of our military hospitals goes back 30 years or more. Why do you think that I have never used my miltary health care benefit since I retired? I pay for my own insurance.
2007-09-09 22:31:30 · update #5
last year 1 hundred and 55 thousand illegals was caught at the border. they was coming from iraq, iran and other country's. they was told to get to mexico and have money, they will be able to get to the USA easily. I'm also worried about terrorist coming in through mexico. they was passing them self's off as mexicans.
2007-09-10 02:41:42 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
We need a fence on both borders but any sane individual that has graduated from junior high school would know that the southern border should be the priority.
Don't expect that from the illiberals though, especially the Democratic presidential candidates. They are always the first ones to blame Americans but not our enemies. They will blame Americans for using the wrong kind of light bulb and causing global warming but they won't blame the radical Muslims for killing 3,000 United States citizens on 9/11.
How can you solve the problem if you refuse to or can't identify it? Barak Osama, Con Edwards, Hillary Clinton - could one of these fools really end up being the person that will have to defend us against the battle-hardened, subhuman scum, that have been at war for thousands of years?
I'm sorry that I haven't directly answered your question but I might get sued by one of the radical leftists for "hate speech" if I use the "M word". (Not Muslim, the other M word.)
Kucinich wants to make Spanish our second language? Are you kidding? This is the first time I've heard this. I should have expected it though after I also recently learned that his health-care plan would cover all illegal aliens.
2007-09-09 22:12:22 · answer #2 · answered by qwert 7 · 8⤊ 1⤋
if a democrat is elected in 08, it will pose a dilemma for the liberals. the issues we face today transcend the decision of a president's ability to deal with them as they are mostly global problems that require the assistance of other countries, as well as congress.
despite the political rhetoric, they will be unable to make good on all their promises. how will libs deal with their failure? i think i already know the answer...Blame Bush, he will carry this stigma and be the scapegoat for them as to why they will fail.
every president has inherited the failures of their predecessor and dealing with it becomes their issues.
we already see the failures of the Dem's to make good on their promises and the excused for why from the libs.
the politicians have figured this out and are hoping that the general public is too stupid to do so. mostly, we are.
the Dem's are pandering to the Latino vote but have failed to realize that if la raza and their groups have their way, these same Dem's would/will be out on the collective behinds.
i think a fence is not needed. if we enforce our current laws and go after those who hire illegals, they will go home on their own and it won't cost us anything.
my state just enacted laws to do so and our illegal population has decreased dramatically along with crime and the associated problems that come with illegals.
2007-09-10 02:45:52 · answer #3 · answered by ? 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Mexico, naturally.
I have no problem with legal immigration. Our expectations should be:
1. Comply with the law. (all of our ancestors did)
2. Once you're a citizen, become a positive and productive citizen of our country.
3. Learn the American culture, while embracing your own.
4. Learn English.
Why is it that so difficult for them to comprehend?
2007-09-09 22:02:40 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 7⤊ 0⤋
Illegal aliens may be filling a need by doing $2 or $3 an hour jobs but they are costing us a thousand times that by forcing us to provide free healthcare, educating their children, and trying to limit their increased crime.
2007-09-09 23:03:56 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 0⤋
Probably more to the point is that Canadians don't want to live in the New Worlds toilet ! Mexican trash offcoarse do, one is better of, the other is worst of.
2007-09-09 22:04:41 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 0⤋
Mexico has in effect perpetrated the same maneuver done by Castro some decades back...emptying their jails,exiling the uneducated, forcing out barrio low life's...essentially the lower echelon of their society they are tired of supporting and/or being victimized by, at our expense. It is deplorable the liberal politicians are pandering to this collection of trash for purposes of power and control....it will be their downfall.
2007-09-09 22:08:04 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 9⤊ 1⤋
I suspect it would be the Canadians who'd be building the fence if they weren't so pathologically polite.
They've got to be tired of Americans sneaking over the border to have babies, buy prescription drugs and otherwise take advantage of their National Health plan. And the American habit of spending US dollars up there at parity with what used to be the less valuable Canadian Dollar is wearing thin now that the US dollar is dropping like a rock.
On the other hand, Bush could have made a better case for invading Canada than Iraq, with the added advantage that the Guard and Reserve could have come home for the weekends and wounded soldiers could have used their National Health Plan when Bush decided to let our own Army Hospitals deteriorate.
We know that there are Al Quaida cells in Canada, because the RCMP passes their intelligence on them to the FBI. And, if they aren't making biological weapons--what the hell ARE they doing with all that mayonaise? And, it would be easier to spot the car bombs. They'd be the ones taking two parking spaces.
2007-09-09 22:26:49 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 9⤋
Mexico is dumping their illiterate people to US in order to evade the burden of giving welfare.
2007-09-09 21:57:20 · answer #9 · answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7 · 7⤊ 1⤋
You are doing a terrible job of making your point about "uneducation population" when you can't even spell the correct word. I assume you mean "uneducated" population.
And I am thinking is Mexico...
2007-09-09 21:57:37 · answer #10 · answered by ~~*Paradise Dreams*~~ 6 · 2⤊ 6⤋