Romney said since there are terrorists here, he would wiretap, do video surveillance, even in churches and mosques. He feels civil rights take a back seat to the right to have a government keep us alive. This is like telling Bin Laden he has already won!!
2007-09-09 13:16:43 · 5 answers · asked by crocolyle10 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Civic Participation
Just what rights do Al Qeada permit it's members? I bet they don't have a lot of privacy.
Survey the mosques, I say. Survey anywhere terrorists can be found. I don't care. It's worth them being watched.
I seirously don't think Bin Laden won if wiretapping is done.
If they wire tapped my house, they'd fall asleep after 20 minutes of my brother trying to find how to win on his video games.
But that's not why I won't vote for Mitt. He's not nice to his dog.
2007-09-09 16:53:06 · answer #1 · answered by Angel Primeau 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
No, that is un-American and if I wanted to live like that, I would move to North Korea.
Why do a cavity search on 80 year old Mary White when Mustapha Kalishnikov gets to board a plane with full diplomatic immunity and freedom from searches?
2007-09-09 20:25:37 · answer #2 · answered by mandrake62896 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
It's a scary thing in a way because there is no place that is private~it has it's pros and it's cons~
One thing that bothers me is the media fussing about eavesdropping on terrorists when they (media) monitor G. W. Bush's activities, 'phone calls, meetings etc: etc: he has no privacy ~ what gives them the right?
2007-09-09 20:24:09 · answer #3 · answered by sego lily 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
i do not just another reason i wont vote for him
Vote Ron Paul 08
the only wasted vote is for the status quo
2007-09-09 23:44:49 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
That's an utterly unacceptable position.
Do you have a link to where he actually said that or should I assume it's as reliable as everything else on Answers?
2007-09-09 20:23:05 · answer #5 · answered by gunplumber_462 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋