English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Too many people have died (and are continuing to die) in Iraq. He thinks he can bully other countries just like that. His dumb decisions obviously aren't helping make the world become a better place. Maybe his intentions are good (wanting to eradicate terrorism) but he seems to be making it worse! He has taken too much innocent blood. He's downgarding humankind with all his stupid plans. I apologize to all those who think Bush is great and brave but I just can't help pointing out how someone can be so evil and dumb at the same time.

2007-09-08 20:41:30 · 22 answers · asked by hungry poet 2 in Politics & Government Government

FYI, im neither a democrat or a republican. I am against terrorism with all my heart but pls tell me did any of the wars in the history of the world solve anything? NO! the end result were always billions of death, centuries of hatred, continuous violence, and intense agony!

2007-09-09 05:53:12 · update #1

22 answers

All he needed was Karl rove and the talking heads in the news media. Remember them slandering McCain "a real war hero" in the 2000 primaries. Don't forget his daddy became famous for bailing out of an airplane and leave his crew to perish

2007-09-08 22:03:36 · answer #1 · answered by austin j 4 · 1 0

Bush, just like any other rich person gets waht they want by not only having money but also by "pulling strings" with the people that he knows. Take a look at Jeb Bush during his run. The votes were cast and all of a sudden 50,000 just disappeared...coincidence...yeah right.
Bush is on his last leg of presidency and so they are pulling every nook and cranny of "kindness" that thay can to ensure people fall for his lies.
Getting into the war: You may or may not like Linkin Park but they have a new song "hands held high" which is an anti bush statement. Its funny they get Bush right down to a "T" in that he mumbles and stutters trying to figure out what to say. haha.
I personally am a person who is an "anti rich", meaning if your income is above 50,000 you should be taxed triple for everything (food, clothing, surpluses, cars, water, cigarettes, etc) Society tends to help more of the rich then it does the poor, if dont believe me look at the amount of homeless people how many of US as normal everyday citazens walk past them and treat them like dirt? 99%.
Since im getting off of the point ill finish with this. The war on terrorism will NEVER be over. Not in a million years unless we can police every single person and turn them into robots to make a "perfect" society. Its a good concept but what happens after we police the criminals and the terorists and the drug dealers and the killers and the Pedophilles and the rapists.....whos left? Every normal citizen, because everyone knows you just cant stop policing and if you let up for one second....all of the above meantioned people will come back.

2007-09-09 04:04:03 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I'm going to copy and paste this from another answer I just made. Read it before telling me that he's dumb or evil.
George W. Bush might dumb down his speeches, but he doesn't actually make decisions except on obviously ethical ones, and on that it seems he knows what he's doing. He's not evil, you can see that in the way he cares about the troops getting funds. You remember how much of an emotional wreck he was because the congress wasn't going to give the troops money to supply them with much needed funds, unless he pulled out of Iraq, which would effectively start a genocide? He's definitely got a heart. I'm sorry. And he's not that stupid, he got in to Yale, which is impressive even though he got C+'s. And don't say, "It was because his dad was the president!" Because his dad was president in 1989-1993, and Bush got his bachelors degree in 1968 (which is about 21 years before.) and his dad might have been a senator, but being the son of a senator doesn't mean anything in Yale. So unless you're a Yale or Harvard graduate, (in which case you would be smart enough to get information from better sources than Micheal Moore) he's smarter than you. If you're going to bring up his grammar mistakes, he speaks for several hours a day, pretty much every day, you'd make many more mistakes.

If you're going to thumbs down me, just notice how I have facts. Unlike you who just says George Bush is heartless because people die.

2007-09-09 03:50:39 · answer #3 · answered by TheUber1337 2 · 1 0

Firstly, I'm not a Bush supporter.

Since the invasion has already been done, there is a definitely a need for America to get it back to shape. It just feels weird for America to simply invade a country, screw its government up, and leave it in shambles. This is one of the aftermath of a war.

If Iraq were to be left alone right now, it would become a terrorist haven to launch more operations against many countries, and more people would die.

On the other hand, what would be a better solution than to continue this current policy???

2007-09-09 03:58:30 · answer #4 · answered by Bananaman 5 · 1 0

I can make this very clear and easy for you to understand.

Take your mom or sister to Iraq and drop her off there for about a month. If she survives the experience, she will have lost probably about 30 pounds, ate food that had bugs in it, had to stay in her house for fear of terrorist bombings, and drank water with live sewage in it.

I DON'T KNOW WHY PEOPLE DON'T UNDERSTAND WHAT TERRORISM IS ABOUT.

IT GOES AGAINST EVERYTHING WE HOLD DEAR TO OUR HEART AS AMERICANS.

For those of you with your head up your a s s that don't understand WHY terrorism is, LET ME EXPLAIN IT TO YOU.

TERRORISM happens because the psychotic people that used to be in charge FEAR LOSING CONTROL OF THE PEOPLE.

THEY DO NOT WANT WOMEN TO HAVE RIGHTS.

THEY DO NOT WANT THEIR WOMEN TO DRIVE.

THEY DO NOT WANT THEIR WOMEN TO BE LAWYERS, DOCTORS, OR ANY KIND OF PROFESSIONALS.

THEY DO NOT WANT THEIR WOMEN TO VOTE.

AS A MATTER OF FACT, THEY HAVE LAWS THAT ALLOW THEM TO STONE THEIR WOMEN TO DEATH FOR JUST ABOUT ANY REASON THEY CAN COME UP WITH.

THEY DO NOT WANT THEIR CHILDREN TO WEAR JEANS AND LISTEN TO ROCK AND ROLL OR RAP MUSIC. (Like every other country where the people have become FREE.)

One of the big secrets about terrorists is they thought they could bring down the world economy (our quality of life and civilization) by destroying a fair chunk of the world's petroleum distribution system. I guess you don't realize what would happen TO ANY COUNTRY ON THIS PLANET if enough of the oil distribution were interrupted. Besides not being able to drive your car, YOU COULD EASILY FREEZE IN THE WINTER. So for all of the dummies that said Bush only did this for oil, understand that without oil, the world stops turning. So yes, this war did have to do a lot with oil. Take away any country's food and you will have a war. Take away any country's land, and you will have a war. Well, taking away any country's energy source will also cause a war.

BUT THE PART THAT REALLY HURTS ME PERSONALLY, IS THE FACT THAT THEY WERE ABLE TO COME INTO OUR COUNTRY AND DESTROY OUR PYRAMIDS ON SEPTEMBER 11th. (I watched the buildings fall that day. If you didn't, try YouTube.) Over three thousand people died that day. It was America's job to protect those people. The fact that we've been at war for these few years and only lost only a little over 3,000 of our God Blessed soldiers is proof of how well we can fight a modern war. When we were fighting for your grandfather's freedom, to remove the last scourge of the planet, (Hitler), 20 MILLION OF OUR SOLDIERS DIED.

SO YOU COULD HAVE THE LIFE YOU HAVE TODAY.

Keep these facts in mind.

It may take a while, but all the FREE countries of the world WILL REMOVE TERRORISM FROM THIS PLANET.

No matter what they do, or how badly they hurt a few of us, FREEDOM WILL PREVAIL.

TERRORISTS ARE NOTHING MORE THAN THE MODERN ROACH OF PLANET EARTH.

And by the way, to the morons who say we are no safer today than 9/11, when was the last time that American soil was attacked? It seems to me that they are doing a DAMN GOOD JOB protecting us. REMEMBER, the terrorists only have to get it right once, WE have to get it right every time.

2007-09-09 03:49:50 · answer #5 · answered by leeloo ♥ 6 · 1 1

How can someone as stupid and stone-hearted as Bush become president?

Quick answer. We get what we deserve. He was elected by a majority of the voters at least the second time.

A funny thing just happened . I used yahoo spell check and the word elected was misspelled the choice presented was fleeced.

2007-09-09 05:52:27 · answer #6 · answered by DrIG 7 · 2 0

LOL.

I honestly don't believe Bush is as stupid as anyone makes him out to be. He graduated from Yale, remember? He just has a way of slipping over his words a lot-- that's not necessarily a sign of stupidity.

Now, I do agree with you that Bush has created a lot of chaos and tends to be more authoritarian that I like.

Yes, he has taken a lot of innocent blood-- Iraqi, American and otherwise.

Still, this isn't an indication of stupidity of stone-heartedness.

He holds an ideology that I disagree with-- neo-conservatism. I'm sure you don't agree with it either. Neo-conservatives believe in America's right to be the world's superpower. They believe we should be in control and have global hegemony-- that we have power and status to maintain, and we have to maintain it.

This war and everything Bush has done was well-planned out by conservative thinktanks full of intellectuals playing war games for years and years. Everything is well-though-out-- even the mistakes...

The only conclusion I can draw is that their ideology and goals simply aren't mine . . . and maybe those goals are stone-hearted.

2007-09-09 03:50:30 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

Simple

Stupid Stone Hearted Voters ;)

2007-09-09 04:59:43 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

He was never elected in 2000, his cousin called him president at Fox. As for 2005 I don`t know if it was publicity or another fraud or many people liked Bush over Kennedy. Also Afro-Americans weren`t given the right to vote.

2007-09-09 03:52:28 · answer #9 · answered by francoistuvul 2 · 2 1

if you are to compare how many people have died in iraq and how many people died in world war 2, you wont be saying those things XD

everything has a cost. we have to sacrifice something for the benefit of all.

2007-09-09 03:50:32 · answer #10 · answered by fatbluerat 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers