When will Bush apologize for his lies about wmd's?

Question

Heres a link on the CIA's risk assessment that Bush ignored.

http://whitehouser.com/war/terrorism/cia-secret-bush-knew-saddam-had-no-wmds-intentional-lie

by Smeather , ARE YOU NUTS , THIS IS NOT A HARMLESS WHITE LIE, HAVE YOU READ THE PAPERS LATELY?

Answer 1

Bush and his supporters will never apologize about the Iraq war. Never! However, they will soon walk the Walk of shame.

Answer 2

If Bush knew there were no WMD's then he was the only one. Everyone else, including Clinton, said they had them. And that was one of the few times Clinton told the truth.

We know they had them because Saddam used them on his own people. So everyone knew they had them. What happened to them is the real question.

One clue is from the satellite videos showing them being trucked out to Syria just before we went in there.

Recently they found proof that the Iranians have been using those same WMD's to attack our soldiers in Iraq.

Oddly enough, just the other day they found traces of the WMD's at the UN building in NY. This was from the weapons inspections done in 2003.

And what about all the tons of serin gas found when we first went into Iraq ? Is your memory that bad?

You should inform yourself better before asking such embarrassing questions.

Answer 3

Hallmark is printing a special batch just for the president to send out to you and your buddies with blanket apologies for everything from tooth decay to male pattern baldness, the Civil War to global warming, giving small pox infected blankets to Native Americans, allowing Hurricane Katrina, and a fill in the blank spot so you can sort of personalize it yourself. Watch your mail box. How did you learn to work a computer?

Answer 4

Please elaborate on WMD's

Your source is kinda lame for your argument. Having to make a judgment call on an Intelligence report doesn't equate to lying with malice. Considering the intel was from one of saddams acolites. I'd be highly suspect myself.

Very good source jonn449 you'll note that every body mentioned and qouted didn't mind being able to duck and cover now though

Answer 5

If someone truly believes something, but it turns out to be not entirely true in the end, does that necessarily make it a lie?

And anyway, these people who are so freaked out when they find out that "God Forbid" a politician lied, Oh My God, I can't believe it, how could that ever happen, my...my...my whole world is crumbling around me, the universe is collapsing, stars are going supernova, Armageddon is here, my savior is coming...

hahahahahahahahahahahahaha

Answer 6

Bush didn't lie. It is liberal traitors like you who are telling lies in your attempts to demonize the people who protect your freedom. You disgust me.

Answer 7

President Bush repeated the information that was given to him from the Pentagon. That is not lying.

Answer 8

He doesn't have to apologize to anyone. He is the president and he could buy you. Get used to it.

Answer 9

When someone actually proves he lied.
Then we can line a lot of people up including democrats to apoligize first.

BTW... have you should read the new report rules, they sound pretty good.

Answer 10

After he apologizes for using a forged document to scare the nation into war.

In early October 2002, George Tenet called Deputy National Security Adviser Stephen Hadley to ask him to remove reference to the Niger uranium from a speech Bush was to give in Cincinnati on October 7. Bush removed the forged document from the speech. This was followed up by a memo asking Hadley to remove another, similar line from the STU. Another memo was sent to the White House expressing the CIA's view that the Niger claims were false; this memo was given to both Hadley and National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice.

In his state of the union address, Bush knowingly and willfully used a faulty document to charge a nation with attempting to buy uranium for use against the USA. He willfully ignored the CIA in order to push his own, personal agenda.