Why hasn't the Equal Rights Amendment been passed, given the potential majority voting power of women?

Question

Where is all of this power women are alleged to have?

"**** I think most men and women already are supportive of the idea of equality between the sexes. Supporting an abstract idea is one thing, however, putting it into practice is quite another. ****"

If the majority of women really wanted equal rights, don't you realize they would only need a fraction of men to agree with them to have acquired their Equal Rights? So where's the pudding?

Shingoshi Dao

The quote above is not my own, but from a woman.

Let me see if I understand some of you. Are you trying to tell me, that women could be so easily influenced by women with fears of a real equality with men, that they were willing to turn down the very opportunity to have it?

If with the reintroduction of the Equal Rights Amendment, women are still influenced against it, how much more time do you think it will take to educated them otherwise?

Answer 1

The ERA started out strong and then ran out of steam. Some fear mongers, most notably Phyllis Schlafly, took credit for its defeat. Her arguments against it were it would require unisex restrooms, make drafting of women into the military mandatory, and have them lose the right to be supported by their husbands. It should be pointed out about her is that while she feels women should be in the home, she has earned three college degrees and travels around the country telling other women how to live their lives. What gets me are people who don't practice what they preach.

Answer 2

Where is all of this power women are alleged to have?

Women and men both cannot ratify the ERA by popular vote. That is not the way the Constitution is altered. The amendment must be approved by 3/4 of the states to take effect. Article Five of the United States Constitution gives Congress the option of requiring ratification by state legislatures or by special conventions assembled in the states. Neither of these has anything to do with a popular vote from my understanding. Though womens groups could lobby Congressmen/women this is an indirect method of power and less potent at times. They could also vote in people to Congress or the state legislatures or into the state conventions who would pass the Amendment as well.

If the majority of women really wanted equal rights, don't you realize they would only need a fraction of men to agree with them to have acquired their Equal Rights? So where's the pudding?


Again see the answer to the question above. There is no direct popularity vote for an amendment. The last time it came to the states for ratification, if failed in doing so by only two states. For a glimpse as to why it might not have passed at all here is a part from wikipedia:

"In the intervening years, public discussion on the ERA has been greatly reduced, though the proposal has been reintroduced in every Congress since 1982."

In essence, it is probably the case that people are taking less and less interest in the ERA. This may be due to less publicity assigned to it by media outlets.

Answer 3

part of the issue was interpretation. Many people inserted their own personal fears into what they thought the ERA said. (such as women would automatically be drafted). Another suspicion was that it was the work of those "feminists", and therefore was scary>

Truth is the ERA is very brief

Section 1. Equality of rights under the law shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any state on account of sex.
Section 2. The Congress shall have the power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.

Section 3. This amendment shall take effect two years after the date of ratification.

Answer 4

Equal Rights exists there is no need for an Amendment.

The reason many women and men did not support it when ti originated is because it is pointless. You can not change the inherent differences between men and women simply by passing an Amendment.This Amendment will not magically make the world a gender-neutral place( thank goodness).

PS Equal rights would exist.The onyl probelm is that women have more 'reproductvie' and parental rights.

Answer 5

The ERA was mostly shot down by women. Phylis Schlafly led the right wing women's brigade against the left wing women's brigade and won.

Men would probably benefit more from a true ERA than women would. Ironically that was the platform for Phylis Schlafly's opposition to the ERA. A few men didn't believe the ERA would be used to give the sexes equal rights and would simply be bastardised the way any other talk of equality is by feminists, for example equating life threatening medical procedure treatment subsidy with abortion subsidy.

At any rate attempting to put the ERA through congress again is unconstitutional in itself. Calling it "the women's equality amendment" makes it an enormous oxymoron which really shouldn't get any support at all.

Answer 6

If you intend to be desirable for a lady you need that guide https://tr.im/GK2mD , The Tao of Badass which may “convert you” right into a guy who draws all the women.
The Tao of Badass is a famous step-by-step program for picking up girls that is which may work for anyone. Regardless old, seems or how inexperienced you're about women. The system teaches you just how to become ‘that person'who is wanted by plenty of women.
The Tao of Badass  it will allow you to ‘that man'by arming you with the data of why you need to be like ‘that person'while giving you all the pick up skills you'll need to become ‘that person'who girls are attracted to.

Answer 7

i did no longer choose for to argue from a place of lack of expertise, so i desperate to look it up. I remember in 80 two while there substitute right into a reliable push as quickly as returned to bypass the era. I remember it being defeated and thinking how some thing that substitute into for a team's magnificent in direction of equality could ever be defeated. at the beginning, Phylis Schlafly is an rather conservative political discern. She substitute into hellbent on struggling with the era from being surpassed. 2nd off, the reason that the era has constantly did no longer bypass while ultimately further to a vote is the addition of the Hayden Rider. you do no longer point out that for the time of your question. as a be counted of actuality, at the same time with your references to those that opposed it, you in no way component to the reason that they opposed it. Feminists DID oppose the era... each time the Hayden Rider substitute into linked to it. what's the Hayden Rider? "The provisions of this text shall no longer be construed to impair any rights, advantages, or exemptions now or hereafter conferred by regulation upon persons of the female intercourse." i substitute into questioned. It sounded good to me. And it sounded good to Hayden on the time as properly. the problem because it substitute into referred to between the era's advocates is the language in itself makes intercourse a attention. that's an extremely diffused component, yet as a substitute of erasing difference in gender by regulation, it codifies it. So each time the Hayden Rider is going on the era, it undermines the which skill and reason at the back of the era, and hence isn't possibly surpassed, and could continually be opposed by feminists and others who choose for genuine equivalent rights for women. that enables you to sum it up, the type you wrote the question, and the intensity to which you have been in a position to mine for rates skill you already know this, Jerry, and you purposefully framed your question as a deceit. You unfold lies and propaganda, possibly when you consider which you're a conservative. Oddly adequate, up till 1980, the social gathering that championed the era... substitute into the Republican social gathering. Oh how the robust have fallen.

Answer 8

The problem is here

If the majority of women really wanted equal rights, don't you realize they would only need a fraction of men to agree with them to have acquired their Equal Rights? So where's the pudding?


Women are all human and are all different, come from different backgrounds and hold different beliefs.

Answer 9

The ERA wasn't passed because it failed to be ratified by the required number of states in the allotted time. It failed because those who didn't support it didn't believe the Constitution should be tinkered with, and that equality under the law could be handled on the state level.

The majority of women weren't, and aren't, against equal rights under the law.

You were right about it being an abstract.

Answer 10

A campaign to bring back the ERA was introduced this year, and it will probably work if it picks up enough steam. However, the STOP ERA campaign was much more effective than it should have been the first time around. Luckily for us, Schlafly's fear-mongering is even more ridiculous now, so we shouldn't have much of a problem with her.