2007-09-08 16:21:53 · 21 answers · asked by somber 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Serious anti Bush answers only please.
2007-09-08 16:25:24 · update #1
Because he is the terroist.. Plain and simple. He is addicted over powering America and killing the people that are fighting for us. Why doesn't he go roll up his sleves and do some dirty work?
2007-09-08 16:26:57 · answer #1 · answered by Baby boy on board [[April 16th]] 3 · 4⤊ 10⤋
Bush is following a globalist agenda. He and his family are globalists. They are not concerned with American sovereignty or Americans.
I believe that the plan is to weaken the United States until the American people capitulate and allow the globalists to do what they want, which is:
the destruction of the U.S. Constitution
disarming the average citizen
collapse of the US economy
collapse of the US borders
collapse of American confidence
the electorate confused with propaganda and slanted media
destruction of the American middle class
Central banks on both sides of the Atlantic pumped billions into the financial system to calm nerves over an impending credit crunch yesterday - but their actions only served to heighten alarm, leading to a fresh plunge in global share prices.
The fading dollar can be held responsible for our troubles. It isn't the dollar's fault, because it is merely a piece of paper, which is un-backed, and the product of a printing press. It is those who administer and spend it recklessly, who have caused its demise, and who are wrecking our economy and nation. What repercussions does a dollar debasement have? Remember, it is in no way the fault of the citizenry. It is totally the fault of government and the D.C. Gang. All of us are merely the victims. Thank you, Mr. Bush.
Every passing day, this new world order, this so called globalism, is eroding 150 years of the hard won gains for American small business and employees, but very few people seem to care. How effective the propaganda has been. Americans don't know who they are anymore.
What do American citizens do next? Give-up to globalism and the Bush family agenda or fight it?
2007-09-08 16:52:18 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
1st, Bush didn't lie. He told us what he knew to be true at the time he said it,
2nd, This is a public community site, everyone is entitled to answer the questions posted.
3rd, How about thinking for yourself? Stop using the liberal talking points!
4th, From you liberals point of view, What is so bad about a president lying?After all Bill Clinton did, and DNA tests PROVED it.
5th, This question has been asked several times... We may never know the truth for sure.., unless... we invade Syria and the surrounding countries to find the WMD's Iraq had.
2007-09-08 16:34:47 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 4⤋
I remember when you loony lefties swore up and down that if there were no WMDs in Iraq, Bush would "plant" them to back up his Big Lie.
Well, there were no WMDs to speak of, and Bush didn't plant any.
It makes your "Bush Lied" Grand Conspiracy Theory fall flat on its face, doesn't it?
2007-09-08 16:42:21 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
To boost the profits of defense contract benefactors.
If you look at companies such as Raytheon, Lockheed Martin, Haliburton and others like them, the pattern will be crystal clear. Republican leaders have a history of diverting billions of tax payer's money to defense contract companies.
2007-09-08 17:18:09 · answer #5 · answered by Chi Guy 5 · 2⤊ 3⤋
"serious anti-bush answers only please?" So you don't want anyone else's opinion? You only want answers from Bush-bashers. That is mighty Liberal of you. Jerk off!
2007-09-08 20:24:58 · answer #6 · answered by ? 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
bush had to do that to save more lives than lost you little popinjay
2007-09-08 17:20:46 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Impotent apopletic fury, in the grand scheme of things, really means very little.
2007-09-08 16:33:28 · answer #8 · answered by Richard S 5 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Folks, even the leadership of my party (Democratic) has backed away from the "lie" charge.
They can't prove any lie, too many top democrats said the same things on the same information, even BEFORE President Bush was in office (I'm not too fond of the attacks on President Clinton, either).
How dare you treat our President as "guilty until proved innocent". You are lying. Prove it.
2007-09-08 16:30:04 · answer #9 · answered by mckenziecalhoun 7 · 6⤊ 6⤋
Only answers from people that agree with me are encouraged. Typical.
2007-09-08 16:29:52 · answer #10 · answered by nileslad 6 · 9⤊ 2⤋
There are no "serious anti-Bush" answers to this speculative question - only "anti-Bush" answers.
2007-09-08 16:35:09 · answer #11 · answered by LeAnne 7 · 4⤊ 5⤋