2007-09-08 16:21:29 · 11 answers · asked by Jack 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Dems already have..isnt it just Scouts now..not "boy"
2007-09-08 16:44:46 · answer #1 · answered by fretochose 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
During the presidential rally for the past election, the Democratic party participants did not spit on the Boy Scouts, but a small group did BOOO the Boy Scout honor guard that were holding the flags during the pledge.
2007-09-09 23:12:46 · answer #2 · answered by OrakTheBold 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Neither.
Why would anyone want to spit on boy scouts?
2007-09-08 23:25:43 · answer #3 · answered by Kelly B 4 · 3⤊ 1⤋
People who are responsible enough to care about politics and their civic duty are unlikely to go around spitting on Boy Scouts or anybody else for that matter, regardless of their party affiliation.
2007-09-08 23:29:12 · answer #4 · answered by BekindtoAnimals22 7 · 6⤊ 1⤋
The left has done everything else to dissolve the traditions of the Boy Scouts so I don't see why some of them would suddenly find any compunction.
2007-09-08 23:36:34 · answer #5 · answered by illiberal Illuminati 3 · 3⤊ 1⤋
What a strange question! I would never spit on anyone! How about you?
Army girl, we didn't cut the funds to VA hospitals 3 years into a war while giving tax cuts to the rich!
We didn't try and cut combat pay!
We didn't cut widows benefits on 1/2!
We didn't throw 20,000 military out of the service at Ft Carson for "Pre-existing personality issues"..AFTER they did a tour in Iraq, most with Purple Hearts and some with closed head trauma!
We didn't send them into combat with too few troops and without body armor or unarmored vehicles!
We didn't try charging them when they were discharged from Walter Reed after thay had been wounded!
We didn't try and charge $800,00 for body armor, like they did at Ft. Hood, because those getting out were missing it. They were missing it because it had been cut off of them in Iraq when they were wounded!
We didn't privatize Walter Reed and make it the laughing stock of the world.
We are for the troops and getting them out of Iraq. Those who want to keep them there for oil should be the ones you should have an issue with.: 4,058 dead, 88 women, mostly in combat, 118 suicides,99 in the past year. 37, 240 Iraqi civilians dead since 2005. We didn't keep records before then thanks to Gen Frank's!
You want to dump on someone, you have the wrong party!
2007-09-08 23:27:20 · answer #6 · answered by cantcu 7 · 4⤊ 4⤋
Depends.
Are the boy scouts gay?
2007-09-08 23:27:56 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
democrats hands down
2007-09-08 23:42:36 · answer #8 · answered by Adam of the wired 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Who would be more likely to have our young men and women killed in a useless war for profit, Democrats or Rebublicans?
2007-09-08 23:26:59 · answer #9 · answered by October 7 · 4⤊ 4⤋
Democrats.....they don't like Boy Scout troops or U.S. troops!
2007-09-08 23:26:42 · answer #10 · answered by ? 6 · 6⤊ 5⤋