Prescott Bush had Adolf Hitler
Bush had Saddam Hussein
BushFraud had Osama Bin Laden
And those are just the ones we know about!
2007-09-08 11:47:22 · 14 answers · asked by Soul Man 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Wow, that is rather scary.
2007-09-08 11:54:10 · answer #1 · answered by Ellinorianne 3 · 2⤊ 5⤋
And the Kennedys. Kennedy substitute top right into a Hitler appeaser. He substitute into an envoy to solid sized Britain. FDR fired him. He owned Nazi shares besides. Now,no person had OBL. Afghanistan substitute into funded ,beginning up in 1979. The chilly war substitute into even even with the undeniable fact that on. OBL fought the Russians and joined together with his own money. throughout the time of the Bosnian war,Al Qaeda operatives have been over there struggling with the Serbs. So,could desire to I say Al-Qaeda substitute into interior the back of Clinton besides. thank you for enjoying. attempt examining some element else besides MoveOn.Org memoes.
2016-10-18 08:57:28 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm not marrying a Bush!
2007-09-08 13:20:41 · answer #3 · answered by Kudos_to_that 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Of course it is. It is also true that there is a terrorist in every Bush.
2007-09-08 12:16:35 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
And the Kennedys. Kennedy was a Hitler appeaser. He was an Ambassador to Great Britain. FDR fired him. He owned Nazi stocks as well.
Now,no one had OBL. Afghanistan was funded ,beginning in 1979. The Cold War was still on. OBL fought the Russians and joined with his own money.
During the Bosnian War,Al Qaeda operatives were over there fighting the Serbs. So,should I say Al-Qaeda was behind Clinton as well. Thanks for playing.
Try reading something else besides MoveOn.Org memoes.
2007-09-08 11:55:42 · answer #5 · answered by Tin Foil Fez 5 · 5⤊ 4⤋
I guess the Bushes are great at funding "terrorists" lol
2007-09-08 12:21:41 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
That is no more true than the statement that there is a liberal politically motivated poster behind every anti Bush post.
2007-09-08 11:53:51 · answer #7 · answered by vegaswoman 6 · 5⤊ 4⤋
No. Sins of the father have nothing to do with the son.
2007-09-08 11:57:56 · answer #8 · answered by Chainsaw 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
As in yours? Yes, its true in that case.
2007-09-08 12:14:28 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Didn't you answer your own question?
Do you want me to cut and paste the text of your "question"?
2007-09-08 11:57:10 · answer #10 · answered by l 5 · 1⤊ 3⤋
haaaaa,,hey you need a best answer ,come on over to my questions,,let it out...chow freepress
2007-09-08 11:56:33 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋