English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

There was not proof at the two case.

2007-09-08 11:47:21 · 12 answers · asked by Krystian P 1 in News & Events Other - News & Events

12 answers

of course he's innocent, the boy's parents only want to make money.

2007-09-08 11:52:05 · answer #1 · answered by Kevin T 2 · 7 1

When you have loads of money you're up for any Tom Dick or Harry to try and squeeze a huge wad out of you, simple as that.
Guilty or innocent, he is naive to the point of stupidity if he thought that having young kids in his bed would not be inviting the kids parents to try and cream some money from him.
But I actually do think Michael is a sad and lonely individual who maybe thought that children would not be hangers on and try to be with him for his fame and wealth. How wrong he was eh?
Don't think he is guilty.

2007-09-08 12:55:52 · answer #2 · answered by rose1 5 · 3 0

Its one of things yoy'll never know.
Lets be honest Michael Jackson although he is a musical genius he is also a very rich bizarre character.
He either says that he is living the childhood that he never had or that he is a responsible father. He cant really do them both at the same time can he.

2007-09-08 12:14:47 · answer #3 · answered by Mia K 3 · 0 0

Everyone who doubts his innocence should ask themselves this question: If you believed your child had been abused, would you let the matter drop if you were paid a large amount of cash?? Any parent will give you the same answer - NEVER

2007-09-08 12:50:13 · answer #4 · answered by JP32 4 · 4 0

I agree with Robert S and I have always thought that was the case.

2007-09-08 12:15:30 · answer #5 · answered by BigMomma2 5 · 1 1

People will do anything for money. I think Lisa knows the truth.

2007-09-08 11:55:26 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 4 0

yes i do think that , he was innocent, he just loves children, the reason the lies where told, the boys perents where just after money he should have sued them for ruining his life

2007-09-08 12:01:08 · answer #7 · answered by bluebrancall 7 · 4 2

I think he's innocent.

2007-09-08 11:52:07 · answer #8 · answered by rayvon :-) 4 · 3 1

He is guilty as can be and got away with it..why did he have those alarms so he could be in the secret room with little boys..come one...the jury really blew it...

2007-09-08 13:38:29 · answer #9 · answered by xyz 6 · 1 4

Yes and i believe in fairies,hobbits and the little people too

2007-09-08 11:53:25 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2 3

fedest.com, questions and answers