I hate them. They take everything to such an extreme that they alienate those who support the same causes as them, and completely destroy an possibility of convincing anyone else. Further, they talk about preventing animal cruelty, but they "euthanize" thousands a year.
2007-09-08 12:39:48
·
answer #1
·
answered by emily_brown18 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
i might have slightly understand for them in the event that they did no longer use dumb celebrities as spokes human beings. As interior the Pam Anderson diatribe against Kentucky Fried hen. they're chickens, destined for the rigidity cooker. recover from the reality that that's an industry like all different. If the actress can not kind a sentence on her own, they could no longer be in a difficulty the place somebody is going to be asking them questions that require lucid replies. additionally this difficulty of throwing paint on human beings wearing fur? It amazes me that extra of them have not gotten their pants sued off, and further the business enterprise down with them. Throw pink paint on me, and you extra efficient be arranged to shed some pink of your own. of direction i do no longer positioned on fur, yet no longer using fact of them. I purely think of evidently stupid on a guy. yet I even have 2 females and a spouse who might at some point choose for to positioned on it, i visit safeguard them with extreme prejudice.
2016-10-10 05:21:12
·
answer #2
·
answered by engman 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
i think peta is ok ihave not really kept up with them plese tell more,i do think mike vick who was just not paying attention to the horrible to animals needs to give some volunteer time or to the humane society.
2007-09-08 15:05:55
·
answer #3
·
answered by CLASS OF 67 3
·
0⤊
0⤋