Watch this video. Apparently from Satilite images in 1994, the exact same spot where flight 93 was supposed to hav crashed in Shanksville, had the exact same scorn markings in the exact same spot before 9/11.
Also, if the twin towers came down due to massive heat from massive amount of jet fuel, then where's the massive fire in Shanksville?
Look for urself -
http://www.nineeleven.co.uk/board/viewtopic.php?t=11181&sid=e24d07bd1ae7242573969d0be4863385
2007-09-08 10:16:49 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
No correct footage? Then point to the 'CNN' or some other major media footage that shows any burning carnage in Shanksville? simply show me.
Show me pictures of 'fire trucks' putting out the fire. It's a plane crash next to 'woods'.
I can show u at least pictures of 10 commerical plane crash where there's pieces of the craft 'everywhere'.
2007-09-08 10:35:56 · update #1
If the plane 'vaborized' then how did a 1-ton piece of 6-ton engine BOUNCE over a mile away? The govt say a 10-15 mph 'wind' blew a 2000 pound piece of the engine???
2007-09-08 10:38:14 · update #2
More foil-hat nonsense? Please stop, it's becoming tedious.
2007-09-08 10:27:51 · answer #1 · answered by gunplumber_462 7 · 2⤊ 3⤋
The film didn't back up very much of what it claimed...the images of the surrounding area did not match to the crash site it only showed similar dark patterns...then there is the problem with it asking where the fire is...there is no proof of even when the footage was taken...could have been days after the crash with the fire fighters just kind of wrapping up...it's you tube...anyone can make and splice these films to be whatever they want.
2007-09-08 17:28:31 · answer #2 · answered by Erinyes 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Then where do you propose the plane went to? Also, when you are viewing pictures of commercial airlines that have crashed, a majority of them have crashed during take off or landing, which is at the lower spectrum of speeds than in mid flight. Drop the 9/11 conspiracy, it didn't happen.
2007-09-08 17:59:35 · answer #3 · answered by ajfrederick9867 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
"Where were the bodies and luggage?" - Give us a break. Where were they at the twin towers? You don't get many big pieces when a plane hits a building or the ground at 300 miles per hour. How long would you expect that jet fuel to burn in the open air, not contained by a building with other material in the building burning? Please stop for a minute and think about these things - you theory does not make sense. Please tell me that you don't vote, as uninformed and easily misled as you are.
2007-09-08 17:29:53 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
You know, questioning the leadership's indoctrination of what happened on 9/11 they have determined is nearly treason!!
Don't let critical thinking and what you saw that day cause you to question the White House propaganda about 9/11!!
If you are a 'true patriotic American' there can only be but one conclusion!
2007-09-08 17:26:05 · answer #5 · answered by Kelly B 4 · 2⤊ 2⤋
the plane came straight down and disintegrated....obviously there wasnt much on the ground to burn or keep the fire going.
are you suggesting the plane is still circling the planet?
find another hobby
2007-09-08 17:33:15 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋