Not soon enough!
And we need to get O-U-T of NAFTA!
It was a*** Collosal Mistake!***
Even former Senator Phil Graham appologised for ever getting us involved in it!
Call your Senators and Congressman and DEMAND that they get us o-u-t of Nafta!
We're the management, don't "ask."
2007-09-08 08:46:43
·
answer #1
·
answered by tom p 3
·
2⤊
0⤋
we could get out of NAFTA and the SPP. I form of understand the court docket's catch 22 situation, given the words of NAFTA and the court docket's accountability to implement treaties as regulation (unlike Bush, courts tend to take their responsibilities to the regulation somewhat extra heavily.) in spite of the undeniable fact that, i think of this could be the time to regulate a protest geared in direction of NAFTA to tutor that the immigration revolt of voters over the Senate invoice has a broader base (and much less simplistic purpose than we are being given credit for). This trucking plan might evade the mega million dollar protection we are putting on our ports to deliver boxes from China run ports in Mexico on Mexican autos, and that i think of that's unacceptable. i could be open to concepts. I additionally notice that there is a huge base of persons against NAFTA, and that shall we make new friends and impact human beings. me2 that's not correct using fact the Mexican autos will fee much less having extra fee-effective exertions, decrease advantages and lesser standards. extra American jobs long gone, no longer in user-friendly terms interior the autos yet interior the ports they %. up from.
2016-10-10 05:09:49
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
They won't,
Canadian truckers have been allowed to drive on American roads for years.
Never a peep out of the truckers or unions about that.
It's not a job issue, it;s a racism issue.
2007-09-08 09:23:02
·
answer #3
·
answered by jeeper_peeper321 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well there you go----
They don't want the illegals here because they're gonna "take our jobs" but I'll bet my hard earned money that it'll be OK for Mexican truckers to use our road-ways because some government office will get the money for that.... so that makes it OK, we just can't let the rest of them work.
2007-09-08 09:14:28
·
answer #4
·
answered by Kaybee 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Not soon enough. George W Bush will veto any attempt by congress to change NAFTA which is actually the brain child of his father George H W Bush.
2007-09-08 08:51:45
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'd like to say soon, but Bush and the Republicans will never let that go. It would cost more for trucking corporations and it might help an American.
2007-09-08 08:43:25
·
answer #6
·
answered by arvis3 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
Hope not to soon, we need them to take all the illegals back to Mexico when they unload here and head back.
We won't have to deport and spend millions doing it ourselves. That is a win win for everyone.
2007-09-08 08:47:19
·
answer #7
·
answered by wild4gypsy 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
Probably when one crashes through a Hilary motor cade.
2007-09-08 08:43:40
·
answer #8
·
answered by crusinthru 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
as soon as a couple trucks failing DOT standards kill some people...
2007-09-08 08:43:56
·
answer #9
·
answered by $andman 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
i am a lib and i hate the fact that clinton signed it
2007-09-08 08:49:39
·
answer #10
·
answered by specal k 5
·
0⤊
0⤋