I know his fans are going to say "Not Guilty".
But you cant deny that the guy is nuts. He hung his baby out of a window.....and he named the poor child "Blanket". He used to be black! Believe it or not!!!
Some people ask, Why is it that if a average person did something like that, they would be in jail for a few year, but a star does it...and all of a sudden its a HUGE LONG drawn out case, that needs more "investigating"....Why? Because they are stars, they get away with everything.
Who thinks He is Guilty? And who things He Is Not?
2007-09-08 08:24:43 · 20 answers · asked by Megan 3 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
I dont mean "He used to be black" as a stab at black people. I just mean, look at all the effed up surgery he has done.
And going off and screwing liitle boys in other countries wont work. He would have been caught faster.
Journalists follow him everywhere, someone would notice if he went to Cobo and got a room for one, and he made only one telephone call to "Little Boys Inc."
2007-09-08 08:40:58 · update #1
Gotta love his music but the guy is definitely a child molester. Back in the early nineties I worked for a producer and he had a fundraiser where Michael showed up in his thriller disguise. My friend and I saw him mingling with little boys all of the time. My friend just called it exploitation. Days later he was accused of child molestation allegations for the first time but he just settled out of court and gave the victims parents millions. Every celeb buys themselves out of trouble. The last case against Michael just about cost him everything he had. Of course he's guilty and if he would've got convicted he would have got killed really fast in prison, like death row! The only thumbs down I'll get will be from a MJ fan that's a freak just like MJ.
2007-09-08 08:42:04 · answer #1 · answered by THE FISH 2 · 0⤊ 5⤋
Wow FISH and others nice make up stories.
Well regarding the name its not his real name.Thousands of fans were waving and came to see michael so he showed the fans his baby thats nothing worng with that plus he was holding it pretty tightly though he didnt "hung" nobody.
He has skin disease which changed his skin color
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X7F3calBvRY&mode=related&search=michael%20jackson%20vitiligo
Regarding his trial, Michael was framed and the parents clearly wanted $$ because they didnt get it they sued him.there are alot of other evidecnces that proved he didnt do anything and the parent had a history of fraud/ extortion and this was a well-planned 1 due to the vulnerable circumstances michael was.If tens of thousands visited michaels house, why would only 1 accuse him of such things?He was 1 of them many sick kids mike was help and e clearly took advantage.
Plus why do u guys say he got away cause he is a celeb? He didint do anything wrong in the first place some might feel good seeing celebs going to jail but they are human after all and mike here isnt an ordinary celeb he is the best entertainer and a great humanitarian if ya want real justine why not sue that greedy mom
2007-09-08 20:28:15 · answer #2 · answered by P.O.D-Lover 2 · 3⤊ 0⤋
First of all, he didn't name the kid blanket, his name is prince michael II, his nickname is blanket, I'm sure that you know someone with a dumb nickname too so what's the big deal? Second of all, if you watch the film of when he held blanket over the railing, he had a hold of him very tightly, and it was for a split second, it wasn't like he was going to drop the baby. Next, he still is black, he has a skin disease and it's called vitiligo, there is proof of it on youtube (along with basically everything else that you are falsely accusing him of) next of all, he was proven innocent, the lady was a gold digger, just like chandler was in 1993. Michael would never hurt a child, so I would suggest that before you go accusing someone of something, check into the facts, which means don't just listen to what the news tells you, actually do research, and if you're too lazy to do so, then just don't talk about it!
⥠We Love You MJâ¥
2007-09-08 18:33:44 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Old news, innocent until proven guilty is what
our court system is all about, and what was the
verdict by the way in the courts. Not guilty you
say, then evidentally a lot of the readers did
not see that part. None of us know for sure
only the one above, and opinions are the
basis of saying he is guilty but that is not
enough to say he is.
2007-09-08 19:04:11 · answer #4 · answered by RudiA 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Guilty of being nuts.
not guilty of child molestation.
he could afford to go to countries where such things are legal if he wanted to do them - hell there are parents in the developed world who'd keep there mouths shut for the right dollar.
Did you watch the court re-enactments on TV - that family's story SO didn't add up - the mother had to keep "pleading the fifth" for chrissakes!
He puts himself in situations where he can have allegations thrown at him - so I guess he's guilty of being stupid and naive too...
2007-09-08 15:35:58 · answer #5 · answered by will T 2 · 3⤊ 0⤋
If anyone would bother to read up on the trial then they would know that he is innocent! His child's name is not Blanket, that's his NICKNAME! And having a skin disease (Vitiligo) does not change their race, he is and always will be African-American!
â¥â¥We Love You Michael!!!!â¥â¥
2007-09-08 22:52:49 · answer #6 · answered by ♥Stranger In Maine™♥ (Thriller) 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Guilty
2007-09-08 15:28:25 · answer #7 · answered by Chris C 3 · 0⤊ 5⤋
true stars get away with everything...but how do we really know that he did something with children...ppl say things...I dont think hes guilty.. but he is guilty for trying to throw his child over the balcony
2007-09-08 15:32:34 · answer #8 · answered by aLl I WaNtEd 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Guilty or not guilty .. I admit, I'm torn .
But I'm quite suspicious of his actions.
Money = Power.
2007-09-08 15:32:14 · answer #9 · answered by CHA0TIK 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Guilty as Charged
2007-09-08 15:29:06 · answer #10 · answered by mr_acecombat 3 · 0⤊ 6⤋