English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

And maybe they were not as forthcoming about 9/11 as we thought?

2007-09-08 08:08:35 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

12 answers

"We the People" have been very stupid indeed. I told my son two months ago, a new tape of Osama would appear before the 2008 election. Voila!! A little sooner than I expected.

I can't believe than every news media outlet accepts it as fact. Of course our wonderful intelligence agency (CIA?) has stated it is authentic. So it must be true!! Give me a break already. Neither was it accidental that a tape "mysteriously" appeared before the 2004 election. Fear mongering, plain & simple.

Every time there is another corruption scandal among the GOP, there is another plot against the American people. Hmmm....maybe the conspiracy theories are true after all....makes you wonder, don't it??

2007-09-08 08:29:10 · answer #1 · answered by Nancy L 4 · 2 0

I thought they did that after 9/11 when they did their "independent" investigation only after victims' family members begged for an investigation. Then they produced this whitewash of an investigation with members of the Bush administration. They told us the WTC towers were hollow tubes when they had 47 massive central columns. Also and that 10,000 gallons of jet fuel (which has a max. temp of 1800deg F)would melt (then changed it to weaken) steel (which won't start to weaken till temps of 2755deg F) and cause a symmetrical freefall collapse of 2 110story buildings. All while forgetting the mention of WTC 7 (like the WTC 1 & 2) which had molten steel 3-6 weeks after 9/11 in the area of collapse. Or that NORAD had stand down orders or that 7 of the hijackers have been reported alive and well. Or that a $40 Billion defense system is impervious to $3 box cutters.

2007-09-08 13:34:45 · answer #2 · answered by Ted S 4 · 0 0

What gets me is that to authenticate this new video, their experts are comparing it to the 2004 video, which also was clearly a fake video. This "fake" Bin Laden looks nothing like the real Bin laden, if you compare photos of the real Bin Laden from 2001 and compare them to the 2004 and 2007 Bin Ladens, it's clear that the 2004 and 2007 Bin Ladens are not the same person as the real Bin Laden. 2004/2007 have different facial structure (nose is different for one) than the real Bin Laden, and no amount of weight loss/gain can account for it.

2007-09-08 14:31:39 · answer #3 · answered by mikeha_ca 2 · 0 0

More and more people are waking up to this insanity, thank GOD!

As for 9/11... You guys need to pick up that joke of an investigation, "The 9/11 Commission Report." Or, just read David Ray Griffin's "The 9/11 Commission Report - Omissions and Distortions" and save yourself the time and energy of coming to the same horrifying conclusions.

2007-09-08 08:42:37 · answer #4 · answered by Sangria 4 · 2 0

This is an adult forum, or so they claim. I am sure thier is a teen section somewhere or maybe conspiracys are us forum for this. Honestly, the amount of postings for this drivel is hitting the ad naseum mark.

2007-09-08 09:31:36 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

As stupid as they are--the non-elected, no talking, Elmer Fudd $oB and his cronies have consistently lied, tricked, divided, and confused US citizens. They thought that you would buy that tape and its BS.

2016-05-19 21:20:15 · answer #6 · answered by gladis 3 · 0 0

No. Read intelligence reports.

2007-09-08 08:14:29 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 4 2

Is the fact that you treat our government as "guilty until proved innocent" by claiming the video is not only fake but that our government is behind it proof that...

...you think we're stupid?

2007-09-08 08:16:34 · answer #8 · answered by mckenziecalhoun 7 · 1 8

I suggest you expand your horizons and follow the news and world events a lot closer!

2007-09-08 08:16:21 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 5

It is because you are stupid.

2007-09-08 08:40:16 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

fedest.com, questions and answers