according to Awesome-O, it is 18.
South Park rulz.
2007-09-08 06:55:51
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
A woodchuck would chuck all the wood that a woodchuck could chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood.
2007-09-08 13:47:24
·
answer #2
·
answered by Mangy Coyote 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Chuck Norris.
2007-09-08 15:41:48
·
answer #3
·
answered by Cristal 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
lots, lots of wood would be chucked assumeing the wood chuck could chuck wood. if the wood chuck could not chuck wood it would be less than if he could chuck wood. wouldn't it?
2007-09-08 13:51:19
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Until it wouldn't chuck anymore.
2007-09-08 14:39:22
·
answer #5
·
answered by anonymous 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
none hillbilly with high powered snipper rifle got to him be for he could chuck wood
2007-09-08 13:48:43
·
answer #6
·
answered by hill bill y 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
6 cords or till his arms wore out,
2007-09-08 13:47:34
·
answer #7
·
answered by William B 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Until it upchucked.
(duh.)
2007-09-08 13:45:58
·
answer #8
·
answered by Jim S 5
·
3⤊
0⤋
you dont want to know
2007-09-08 23:42:21
·
answer #9
·
answered by Jeff m 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
DO YOUR HOMEWORK!!!
2007-09-10 20:31:46
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋