English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

and dont say o they have more money and and 3 shows and crap liek that i think tna 1 1hour show is better the all 3 wwe shows and a wwe ppv put together

2007-09-08 05:46:20 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports Wrestling

16 answers

I can't, and they arent.....and with two hours, they will catch up with ratings....and with the wwe going in front of congress....the wwe is in trouble...

2007-09-08 05:52:24 · answer #1 · answered by Book of Wrestling 6 · 2 2

um ratings is a good one, for the past month tna has been stuck below the 1.3 range. while raws, ecws, and smackdown shater tna ratings

storylines are interesting, way more creative then tna.
um, c.m punk
wwe beats tna in just about every thing, maybe except talent useage, but ratings, crowd draws, MONEY WISE, FAN BASE, and if tna is so better then the wwe, how come tna cant even compete with the ecw???

2007-09-08 13:06:23 · answer #2 · answered by loyal 2 tha bone 3 · 1 0

WWE has better talent. They have the wrestlers I want to watch, like Rey Mysterio, Edge, The Hardyz, Shelton Benjamin, Shannon Moore, Undertaker, Kane, and HHH. TNA doesn't really create their own talent, they just dig up old WCW and fired WWE wrestlers.

2007-09-08 15:02:03 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

I can come up with 3 good reasons, WWE has a bigger roster, It is on more often and has more hours, TNA does have 2 things such as, Great Talent and Kurt Angle

2007-09-08 12:54:27 · answer #4 · answered by Dimmu Borgir 5 · 1 0

in my opinion I think WWE & TNA are good but I think WWE is more entertaining with the storylines and WWE has the best Wrestlers.

2007-09-08 12:55:13 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

wwe had starz/talent tna got tna run off with wwe starz/talentbasically just a rip off from original

2007-09-08 12:57:49 · answer #6 · answered by khanshazam 3 · 0 0

WWE is more popular
Has merchandise (more that TNA)
TNA copies wwe SO MUCH..

2007-09-08 12:56:12 · answer #7 · answered by Rated R Diva ♥ 5 · 2 0

Because it's what I choose to watch and it may have something to do with some guy named Paul Levesque (Triple H, in case your clueless).

2007-09-08 13:49:16 · answer #8 · answered by Cary F 4 · 0 0

wwe has better wrestlers, better-looking too, its 2 hours, it actually has a decent wresting ring (4-sided), i could go on..

2007-09-08 13:21:23 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

They have Torrie Wilson. Enough said.

2007-09-08 13:04:33 · answer #10 · answered by Dave 5 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers