English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I read online and in a magazine article that in the 1850s, Robert E. Lee have some of his slaves beaten because they want to be free.

2007-09-08 05:39:16 · 4 answers · asked by grasshopper_60619 2 in Arts & Humanities History

4 answers

That Robert E. Lee whipped his slave as alleged, is a lie of the most profound nature. To demonstrate his actual feelings as to slaves and their desires for freedom, following is a letter by the hand of Robert E. Lee prior to the war and following that, the words by his slave demonstrating (to some degree) the depth of the relationship between them.

Robert E. Lee letter dated December 27, 1856:
I was much pleased the with President's message. His views of the systematic and progressive efforts of certain people at the North to interfere with and change the domestic institutions of the South are truthfully and faithfully expressed. The consequences of their plans and purposes are also clearly set forth. These people must be aware that their object is both unlawful and foreign to them and to their duty, and that this institution, for which they are irresponsible and non-accountable, can only be changed by them through the agency of a civil and servile war. There are few, I believe, in this enlightened age, who will not acknowledge that slavery as an institution is a moral and political evil. It is idle to expatiate on its disadvantages. I think it is a greater evil to the white than to the colored race. While my feelings are strongly enlisted in behalf of the latter, my sympathies are more deeply engaged for the former. The blacks are immeasurably better off here than in Africa, morally, physically, and socially. The painful discipline they are undergoing is necessary for their further instruction as a race, and will prepare them, I hope, for better things. How long their servitude may be necessary is known and ordered by a merciful Providence. Their emancipation will sooner result from the mild and melting influences of Christianity than from the storm and tempest of fiery controversy. This influence, though slow, is sure. The doctrines and miracles of our Savior have required nearly two thousand years to convert but a small portion of the human race, and even among Christian nations what gross errors still exist! While we see the course of the final abolition of human slavery is still onward, and give it the aid of our prayers, let us leave the progress as well as the results in the hands of Him who, chooses to work by slow influences, and with whom a thousand years are but as a single day. Although the abolitionist must know this, must know that he has neither the right not the power of operating, except by moral means; that to benefit the slave he must not excite angry feelings in the master; that, although he may not approve the mode by which Providence accomplishes its purpose, the results will be the same; and that the reason he gives for interference in matters he has no concern with, holds good for every kind of interference with our neighbor, -still, I fear he will persevere in his evil course. . . . Is it not strange that the descendants of those Pilgrim Fathers who crossed the Atlantic to preserve their own freedom have always proved the most intolerant of the spiritual liberty of others?
Rev. Wm. Mack Lee (slave to Robert E. Lee stated, I was born June 12, 1835, Westmoreland County, Va.; 82 years ago. I was raised at Arlington Heights, in the house of General Robert E. Lee, my master. I was cook for Marse Robert, as I called him, during the civil war and his body servant. I was with him at the first battle of Bull Run, second battle of Bull Run, first battle of Manassas, second battle of Manassas and was there at the fire of the last gun for the salute of the surrender on Sunday, April 9, 9 o'clock, A. M., at Appomatox, 1865.

Rev. Wm. Mack Lee was born on the plantation of Gen. Robert E. Lee, in Westmoreland County and at the outbreak of the civil war went to the front as the body servant of his distinguished master. He cooked and waited on the Southern chieftain during the entire four years of the war, being with him at the surrender at Appomattox. The fact that the war had set him free was of small moment to him, and he stayed with his old master until his death. He is a ***** of the old type, distinguished looking, polite in manner, and, despite his age, is straight, firm of step

2007-09-08 07:48:19 · answer #1 · answered by Randy 7 · 0 4

that a is a bold face lie. The only slaves he had was an death gift on his wife's side. The were
freed quickly

2007-09-08 06:22:26 · answer #2 · answered by harlin42 3 · 2 3

That he was invincible.

2007-09-08 05:51:31 · answer #3 · answered by SgtMoto 6 · 0 4

NOT TRUE

2007-09-12 02:16:21 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

fedest.com, questions and answers