Which of these scenarios would you most like to see happen; and which one would you LEAST like to see happen??
1) Assassination or impeachment of George Bush
2) Osama Bin Laden captured or killed
3) Hillary Clinton or Barak Obama elected President
4) Karl Rove indicted or imprisoned
5) Fatal heart attack or hunting accident for Dick Cheney
6) Democrats lose control of House or Senate in 2008
2007-09-08 04:53:29 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
What exactly IS a "terrorist apologist"? And what exactly do your six points of contention have to do with terrorism?
1. The assassination or impeachment of George Bush is not likely to happen, but if it did - it would be implemented by American citizens who are disillusioned with an incompetent President, not terrorists;
2. Osama binLaden's capture or assassination would have little effect on the current terrorism climate around the world which has been created by the war mongering Bush administration's international bullying tactics;
3. The election of either Clinton or Obama will have little impact on the terrorist movement afoot worldwide since neither of those candidates have the power to change what the Bush administration has already put in place for the sake of OIL and WAR PROFITEERING;
4. Karl Rove should go to prison, but - again- that's an internal political matter having to do with this country, not having anything to do with terrorists;
5. A fatal heart attack is certainly a realistic possibility considering Cheney's poor health - as is a hunting accident, considering Cheney's poor aim - but neither incident has anything to do with terrorism;
6. If Democrats lose control of the House or Senate in 2008, it will be because they failed to keep their promise of ending this immoral, illegal, unjustifiable 'war' which was started only so that a handful for wealthy elitists, industrialists and power brokers could become wealthier and more powerful. Again, it has nothing to do with an international terrorist movement that resents the United States, which represents only 5% of the global population and yet squaders more than 55% of the world's resources. -RKO- 09/08/07
2007-09-08 05:13:59 · answer #1 · answered by -RKO- 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
#2/3 are tied for me for the most. I'm not a fan of the president or Cheney but would never wish them harm.
BTW,
George W. Bush is a Republican president....
and Osama Bin Laden is still running free 6 years after he attacked our country.......
billions of dollars are missing, hundreds of thousands of innocents are dead.
2007-09-08 09:50:11 · answer #2 · answered by europa312 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Stay_fan2, you seem to have a misunderstanding of the word "prove". Naming those you believe to be "terrorist apologists" isn't the same as proving they are.
2007-09-08 05:23:25 · answer #3 · answered by OPad 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I'm a liberal and not a terrorist apologist so I'll take my two points and not bother answering this worthless ******* question.
2007-09-08 05:07:54 · answer #4 · answered by redphish 5 · 4⤊ 0⤋
Hahaha...
You never stop do you?
You do realize your "scenarios" are the political equivalent of a fourth grader playing with his GI Joes,right?
2007-09-08 05:11:29 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 3⤊ 0⤋
I am not a terrorist apologist.
2007-09-08 05:31:29 · answer #6 · answered by Lindsey G 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Name one person on this planet without FLAW?
Considering this unintelligent / narrow minded question you've just asked I wouldn't be surprised if you chose yourself.
2007-09-08 05:11:33 · answer #7 · answered by Ellie 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
3. That will do the most good at this point.
2007-09-08 05:00:04 · answer #8 · answered by ? 6 · 4⤊ 0⤋
terrorist apologist, that's a good one.
now i can mix it up, you know say "tree-hugger" sometimes and "terrorist apologist" another time
2007-09-08 05:12:33 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
"LIBERALS....and other terrorist APOLOGISTS...???"
Why would I want to answer such a narrow minded question?
2007-09-08 05:02:34 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 1⤋