English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

The Army Chief of Staff says the surge is not working, it's weakening our military, and we need to start withdrawing from Iraq...
------------

Viewing the matter from a different perspective, the Joint Chiefs of Staff are eager to reduce the troop totals as soon as possible because they see worrying signs of strain on troops and their families.

The Army chief of staff, Gen. George Casey, has a unique perspective on this because he was Petraeus's predecessor for 2 1/2 years and he is openly skeptical of Petraeus's theory that sending extra U.S. troops to Baghdad would create the conditions for Iraqi leaders to agree on power-sharing deals.

On Thursday Casey said he remains convinced that a smaller U.S. force would "cause Iraqis to do more, faster" — a central part of the argument that a bigger U.S. force tends to deepen the Iraqis' dependency and weaken the incentive for them to solve their underlying political differences.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070907/ap_on_go_ca_st

2007-09-08 04:24:22 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

6 answers

I'm afraid and have every reason to believe he will cherry pick facts again like he did with the intelligence before the invasion and he kept doing throughout this catastrophe

2007-09-08 16:49:16 · answer #1 · answered by justgoodfolk 7 · 1 1

right here is the actual deal straight away from the army. 1st link. He runs issues previous the guy in charged of the actual backbone of the army....The Sgt important of the army. Generals purely bounce tall homes and are swifter than a dashing bullet. The NCO's seize bullets of their tooth, kick trains off the song and raise the construction and walk under it. The 2d link is all he instructions in a huge image. The third is to the SOCOM website. (particular Operations Command) The 4th is a catalogue of all energetic contraptions. The 5th is a few stuff coming to a "Theater" close to a pair undesirable dumb fool's front door. The final primary of the army grow to be Omar Bradley he previous in 1981. A bio is on the final link.That call is purely utilized in a declared conflict. SSG US military seventy 3-80 two

2016-12-13 03:16:24 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

he only seems to listen to those that agree with him. Casey also said the war on terror couldn't be won.

2007-09-08 16:37:12 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Your question should be...Will he listen to the man there or the General whom was critical of the plan to start and is LOOKING FOR AN EXCUSE to blame the plan....but keep spinning there Libby...some day maybe you can actually see the truth....

You probably believe Rosie that GW was the person behind 9/11

2007-09-08 04:33:34 · answer #4 · answered by consrgreat 7 · 0 5

bush doesn't listen to generals.

that would mean he isn't the decider.

2007-09-08 16:37:51 · answer #5 · answered by brian 4 · 1 0

check your facts genius...general patreus says it is, bob gates says unilateral surrender ...aka..harry reid imboldens the enemy..what do you need, a roadmap?

2007-09-08 05:45:12 · answer #6 · answered by koalatcomics 7 · 0 5

fedest.com, questions and answers