why hasn't this put into practice a long time ago??
2007-09-08 01:41:24 · 28 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
Right on!! Let the child molesters and murderers see what it feels like to be violated for no good reason! Let them have permanent injuries and side affects from someone doing something vile and un-natural to them. Let them face the possibility of death because someone decided to experiment on them for some useless reason!
They would deserve every horrid minute of it. Brilliant idea!
2007-09-08 01:50:02 · answer #1 · answered by sesamenc 4 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Oh yes, we should defiantly treat PEOPLE inhumanely because this would certainly undo all the damage they caused and cure the others of their abusive tendencies TWO WRONGS always make things right. These people were the victims of abuse themselves how do you intend to address the wrongs committed on them? People are always so quick to deal out punishment without having all the facts. As for animal testing true, they could use different methods but sometimes those methods don't always give a full picture and are often much more costly and many companies are in the process of changing their testing methods but this takes time and personally I would rather they know what the effects of particular chemical tan go back to the days when they just assumed the product was safe until the lawsuits stared.
2013-09-12 11:29:49 · answer #2 · answered by one 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
well i belive that we should stop animal testing. though i have some sympathy for those convicted of murder. (its far too often that people are "proven" to be murderers on such limited evidence that its amazing they were ever incarcirated, though on the same coin those who commited murder, i mean actually (and yes i know that makes up most of the people who were convicted for it) i say poke and prod away! they took something so sacred as life? then they should offer theres up as forfit properity. now on to the child molesters. this may sound moreso harsh then my lofty idealistic writings above, but this touches something very personal to me, my neices and nephews were mollested... i wish nothing more then to be the cause of that mans slow, and agonising demise... **** animal testing! make em bleed! animal testing would be far too humane for the likes of them!
2007-09-08 01:55:36 · answer #3 · answered by wicca_4_life2003 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
that's my religious concept that God positioned human beings peculiarly animals and different creatures on the earth. on a similar time as i've got not got self assurance that all and sundry animal finding out is undesirable, those businesses that stuff them in small cages, do no longer feed them, and continuosly torture them are incorrect. That being stated, I even have actual no problem with animal finding out as long as that's not torture. The existence of human beings, in my religious concept, is a lot extra efficient than that of any animal. Therefor, human beings could provide consent to be examined on. Animals can not provide consent, yet they are in a position to't disagree to being examined on the two, so non-cruel animal finding out is great with me. Too a lot of human beings fee animal lives over the lives of human beings or maybe unborn babies. unhappy.
2016-10-10 04:44:21 · answer #4 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yep. I also think that "population" should be put to work doing dangerous jobs like coal mining. If there is an accident, well.....it just saved a whole bunch of tax payers dollars.
2007-09-08 01:49:13 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
yeah!!!!! animals should NOT be tested on. cuz animals rock and it's just plain cruel to do something like that. it should be against the law. i mean, what if my dogs parents r being tested on? ok, i really doubt that. but other animals r being tested on rite now so something should be done about it. and murderer's r human so the test results would be more accurate.
2007-09-08 01:52:01 · answer #6 · answered by blondE 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
i am down with that idea. Child molesters deserve anything that they get, and animals are guilty of nothing. Good idea.
2007-09-08 01:47:36 · answer #7 · answered by out for justice. 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Human rights activists are just a little more convincing than animal rights activists. so until that changes ill keep using shampoo tested on bunnies, instead of inmate #34565.
2007-09-08 01:49:00 · answer #8 · answered by why not 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
I think that is an AWESOME idea!!! I would rather test on those worthless people then these poor animals.
2007-09-08 01:49:06 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
mhm. I helps in 2 ways! Animals will be safe and murderers and molesters will get what they deserve!!!.....and might think twice next time!!
2007-09-08 01:48:10 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋