For example if it cost you $31 to drive to your destination yet only $30 to fly, would you still rather fly than drive?
2007-09-07 17:20:48 · 7 answers · asked by Toddacanda 5 in Travel ➔ Air Travel
If it saved a lot of time because of the distance I would fly even if it was more expensive. If I had just 3 days to spend on my destination and I spent half of that time driving I would opt to fly. However, if it was such a short distance that I could drive there in up to 3 hours I would drive most likely. I think 3 hours would be my cut-off for driving unless the airports were so convenient that a quick flight would be worth it.
2007-09-07 17:59:54 · answer #1 · answered by June 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
depends, if I can share the gas with other people in the same car, it's cheaper, besides, flying cost doesn't include tax which could be more than $30 plus you have to be at the airport over an hour ahead, then, when you arrive, you still need to pay for the airport transfer. Also, timing is important, driving is flexible, whereas, flying has to fit into the flight schedule. All these has to take into consideration.
2007-09-08 00:33:19 · answer #2 · answered by shuk-yin 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It's hell of alot cheaper to fly around Australia than it is to drive around... so yes I would rather fly for sure
2007-09-08 00:23:41 · answer #3 · answered by • Koala • uʍop ɹǝpun 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes i would fly because sometimes it can get u there faster and u dont have to pay that much but unfornatley flying is to expensive!!
2007-09-08 00:26:28 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
if you want to save a lot of time, it's better to fly.
2007-09-08 01:11:57 · answer #5 · answered by Lola 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes, to give more time at the destination.
2007-09-08 00:34:22 · answer #6 · answered by jen 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yep, faster & cheaper
check out rates here
http://www.choiceretreat.com
2007-09-08 00:30:19 · answer #7 · answered by Indiana Jones 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋