So the argument against evolution goes something like this...?

Question

Evolution has a ton of evidence. Creationism has no evidence. I don't believe in evolution because no one can prove it without a doubt. Therefore creationism is true.

Is that about it?

Answer 1

Actually it's usually something like "According to evolution..." [insert strawman argument here that has nothing to do with evolution] "...which doesn't make sense, therefore I don't believe it."

Either that or "If evolution were true then..." [insert scientific-sounding claim that was copied off of a creationism site run by an evangelical Christian] ", therefore it's false."

Note also that "evolution" by their definition is often misused to refer to evolution, abiogenesis (like Martin S's post), cosmology, thermodynamics, and any other science that conflicts with a literal interpretation of the Bible.

Needless to say, I can't think of any creationists I've met who actually understood what evolution was and what the model proposes. When I hear people say "Nobody's seen one species turn into another", "It's just a theory", "It says humans came from monkeys", etc. then I know I'm dealing with somebody who has obviously never done an even minimal amount of research on the subject.

Answer 2

extra complicated than that. It is going extra like this. you commence with the "expertise" that god exists, and that he cares concerning the universe and human beings specially. that's then stressful to have self assurance that he would not have been messing around together with his advent with a view to get what he needed (us, apparently). so as that they pass searching for the transitions in evolution that are very stressful to describe. that may not stressful - we've in user-friendly terms been analyzing evolutionary biology for somewhat over a century. They the two deduce that evolution substitute into helped alongside or that it purely did no longer take place. in case you look on the comparable information with the concept god would not exist or would not intrude interior the universe, you're surprised by ways properly evolution explains each thing, and you assume that quicker or later we will understand how those "unusual" transitions got here approximately. There fairly isn't any component arguing, using fact the positions are fairly separated by the beginning assumptions, no longer the information or the best judgment.

Answer 3

"It is time for students of the evolutionary process, especially those who have been misquoted and used by the creationists, to state clearly that evolution is a FACT, not theory, and that what is at issue within biology are questions of details of the process and the relative importance of different mechanisms of evolution. It is a FACT that the earth with liquid water, is more than 3.6 billion years old. It is a FACT that cellular life has been around for at least half of that period and that organized multicellular life is at least 800 million years old. It is a FACT that major life forms now on earth were NOT at all represented in the past. There were NO birds or mammals 250 million years ago. It is a FACT that major life forms of the past are no longer living. There used to be dinosaurs and Pithecanthropus, and there are none now. It is a FACT that all living forms come from previous living forms. Therefore, all present forms of life arose from ancestral forms that were different. Birds arose from nonbirds and humans from nonhumans. No person who pretends to any understanding of the natural world can deny these facts any more than she or he can deny that the earth is round, rotates on its axis, and revolves around the sun."

- R. C. Lewontin "Evolution/Creation Debate: A Time for Truth" Bioscience 31, 559 (1981) reprinted in Evolution versus Creationism, op cit

Answer 4

There are plenty of arguments against evolution, none of which make much sense. Many are based upon pseudoscience and mythology. The real question is "why do people deny the truth of evolution in the face of so much indisputable evidence? Evolution clashes with the core beliefs of many people, especially conservative Christians. Denying evolution is acts as a defense mechanism for these people, who can't accept evolution as true. Once they have established for themselves that evolution is false, then they pick an argument that makes sense to them.

Answer 5

I think that the chimpanzees are opposed to evolution because they watch what goes on in all 3 branches of our government and correctly feel they ( the chimps) are far more evolved

Answer 6

creation evolves
evolution creates

why everyone need such silly stuff to argue about?

Answer 7

You can't prove anything beyond a doubt
No experiment can be duplicated
Doesn't mean we can't think...
An electron can be in two places at the same time
Does that mean both concepts are wrong....
Science...while not knowing everything..is on the right track
At least we have good minds exploring...
Creationism....dead...except it, no possibility of change

Answer 8

Geezah took the words right out of my brain.

Not really, but If I could have thought about it long enough, the statement might then be true.

ethier way, what Geezah said!

Answer 9

No, the argument against macro-evolution and the start of life through material forces goes like this. The information contained in the code of even one cell of a living organism is so complex that we can only begin to understand a part of it.

Complex code doesn't arise by chance. Therefore inanimate matter didn't self organize, come alive all by itself and through millions of years of natural selection erasing all of the mistakes create a code that is more complex than we can come up with using our brightest minds aided by our best super computers.

Anyone who thinks that it could happen that way doesn't understand that the odds make it statistically impossible. It is more likely that some super intelligent aliens came here from another solar system and put designed organisms on this planet than it is that it just all happened through naturalistic forces.

Answer 10

Argument of creationism: At one time, there were no humans. Therefore, God made us.
Argument of intelligent design: Look at all the beauty around us. It's like a work of art. Well, you can't have a work of art without an artist. Therefore, God made us.
Argument of evolution: (Censored due to sheer lack of unevidenced, conjectural claims)