PROBABLY! I mean... R&S does have the most report-happy, thumbs down, ignorant trolls.... *sigh*
I feel better now!
*edit: How much you wanna bet that someone on this post will get reported!?
Rachel RTR - That would be friggin awesome, but I doubt it, because then those people would probably be getting threatened daily.
2007-09-07 08:28:45
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Sounds as though YQA has gotten serious about being a Question/Answer source, as opposed to a discussion forum or chatroom.
Likely a lot of things will change as a result. I read through the thing twice to be sure what they're saying.
A person who gives invalid reports repeatedly will lose the ability to get questions and answers removed and accounts suspended the way they've been doing.
Sounds like a positive change.
2007-09-07 07:40:41
·
answer #2
·
answered by Jack P 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
This has got to be a joke.
This is R&S. All that we have in here are opinions, even though everybody is absolutely convinced that his or her opinions are "right" (even more so than in any other category of discussion).
I've noticed in reading the TOS (which I have, a few times) that one of the criteria for violation is that you say something "offensive." I submit to you that there is absolutely nothing to say in this section that can't be construed as "offensive" by somebody else, simply because it represents a different perspective. I've even been reported, and received violations, for stating plain uneditorialized facts. And pretty much everybody who's been on here for very long has had the same experience.
If this is some kind of attempt to address the unfair handing out of violations, forgive me for being skeptical.
To answer, though, my money's on a religious believer. But that's just my opinion!
2007-09-07 07:38:27
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
baby... ALL gods, their aliases, their kinfolk, their progeny and domain names are imaginary. “Humanity replaced into plodding alongside and then at some point some smartarze pronounced thunder replaced into brought about by an invisible guy contained in the sky. The atheist pronounced “Büllshït!” we've been inquiring for evidence ever because of the fact. You in no way supplied any... Cos in case you probably did have some you does no longer ought to pull the "have faith" card. you are the individuals insisting an imaginary little bushy-nosed psychopath is swooping approximately contained in the ether doing the worst a possibility mayhem on harmless infants... no longer I? If I advised you I had a Pixie in my pocket i'm advantageous you may ask to be sure it.. So what we are asking is... produce your Pixie ;)” Frank Zindler: shop in mind that the burden of evidence is on the guy alleging the life of something. If somebody tells me that the Easter Bunny is hiding in somebody's clothing closet someplace in North u . s . a ., there is not any choose for me to hunt each closet on the continent. the guy making the declare has to offer the rabbit or end dropping my time. ~
2016-10-04 03:57:11
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I saw that today. Are they going to indicate that the person is a "top reporter" like they do the "top contributor?" I hope not.
There are lots of people in lots of areas that report people. Many are dumb!
2007-09-07 07:59:57
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
if you read through the process it says that if two or more people report a user that user will go under investigation and could be banned. so it stands to reason that the Fundie Report Hit Squad will start singling out users that are not believers or are of a different religion and start knocking them off one at a time...
2007-09-07 07:39:24
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
You're joking...
---------------
Oh my word you're not joking...
"What does it mean to be a trusted reporter?
You become a trusted reporter on Answers by contributing questions and answers and reporting abuse that actually violates the Community Guidelines. " - Y!A Blog
2007-09-07 07:37:01
·
answer #7
·
answered by Southpaw 7
·
3⤊
0⤋
Hmm, I only report porn posters and the like, so I would be accurate, but low volume... Hmmm...
2007-09-07 07:37:35
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
There should be a badge for "Top Reporter." That way we know who to avoid.
2007-09-07 07:52:16
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
1⤋
good question. it would be great to see the questions they reported too.
2007-09-07 07:37:45
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋