It's not likely. I don't have any friends that would be willing to wear a berka and have a Muslim man treat them worse than an animal. Do you know that Muslim women can be murdered by their husbands and there is no consequence in Sharia Law?
2007-09-06 15:07:44
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
You asked a really good question, and I apologize for a longer answer but I think this is the best answer I have at the moment.
I feel we only screw ourselves when we confuse our own western narcissism and general Islamic dysfunction as being specifically against us. It's not about us. The Chinese, Indians, Japanese, Russians all are equally as endangered by radicalized Islam, I'll explain below.
Left to it's own devices, Islam has yet to undergo anything resembling the Christian equivalent of the Reformation or the Counter reformation. Prior to that, Christians were even more willing to pick up the sword and die for the Cross than Muslims. After the decimations of nearly 80 years of continuous war. After the Peace of Westphalia, Christianity became practically speaking much less given to warfare in the name of the Lord.
European warfare became so confused and bloody and desperate and devolved to a point where possibly one of the most "liberal" and "radical" concepts decried by modern day Evangelicals was conceived.
The concept of "Separation of Church and State", was founded originally on the principle that "the state" might/could conduct warfare but that "the church" should only take issues where interests of faith are directly concerned. This was not some radical liberal view of some sketchy fringe philosopher, this idea was primarily conceived of by none less than the Pope of the Roman Catholic Church at the time. The confusion and counter-interests of all the various factions compelled this "solution" to the various problems which existed at the time. European warfare in the space of less than 50 years became the province of nation states rather than trans-kingdom/national religious bloodfests.
Islam has yet to clear this fundamental philosophical hurdle. In the Islamic viewpoint it's STILL , "Church and State....Perfect Together."
As we saw when the dictatorial top was taken off the religious pressure-cooker that is Iraq, Sunnis and Shia REALLY HATE one another and with generous funding from petrodollars and their respective Saudi and Iranian benefactors, are perfectly content to soak the streets of Iraq with blood.
What advise today might we give, had some modern-day Secular Humanists or Hindus or Chinese Communists or Capitalist Americans (to pick a random unrelated groups) been plopped into the middle of some internecine intra-Christian war of the 1400's , the best policy would be to make some boats and get the hell away from the fighting.
And so it is today, our best policy is to build some fusion reactors, and bug the heck out unless we have no other options.
Islam or just fundamentalism today is far more dangerous to its adherents and factions as well as everyone else with the modern technology and weaponry and suicidally fundamentalist tendencies of some of the factions. As a society we do well to make ourselves as scarce as possible until it's unavoidable that we become involved.
For some 9/11 was that moment, however our politicians and many of our military are thinking conventionally and clearly not thinking about the ramifications of our 'bring it on' aggressive response to those attacks, however viscerally satisfying that response might have been, it may not have "been prudent at this juncture".
I suspect, however, it will break down in one of two ways,
Sooner or later, some terrorist group or Islamist nation is going to use nuclear weapons
If the US is VERY VERY lucky, that initial use will not be against the US mainland or critical US interests. In this instance we may wish to consider whether the Iraqi invasion was genuinely in the best interests of the US people and not the indulgence of a belligerent administration.
An Islamist on Islamist nuclear exchange would very quickly have the result of bringing the fetish of nuclear weapons into the correctly stark contrast these gruesome weapons bring upon their users and potential recipients.
I suspect if someone uses nuclear weapons somewhere against the US, we may be compelled to warm up either or both of two equally unpalatable ideas.
Either "tucking tail" as a function of national necessity (if some "Jericho" type event occurred) OR
Conversely committing ourselves completely to the cremation and systematic decimation of the more significant number of at a minimum several tens of millions of Muslim fundamentalist supporters in 1/2 dozen countries.
Morally the last choice is of course the most historically repugnant since in the final analysis such a response - whether forced or by choice, would practically from the perspective of souls lost make us no better than any of the worst regimes which history has to offer.
As fubared as it may seem, those hundreds of nuclear weapons quietly sitting idly are still probably protecting us, from just such an unthinkable event.
2007-09-06 18:32:09
·
answer #2
·
answered by Mark T 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
I'm glad you found that on your own. You should really read the book "While Europe Slept" and "American Alone" it will really wake up your eyes about what is going on with the extreme Islamic. If they feel that we are pushing a holy war on them, then they will do what they can to put an end to western civilization.
The next terror attack is supposed to happen in our schools with our children. Why do you think that almost 20 buses were stolen in Texas, and sometime last year 2 Muslim men hoped on a school bus dissappeared for a while? They are planning
2007-09-06 15:09:26
·
answer #3
·
answered by smrick925 1
·
2⤊
0⤋
The ordinary Muslim has no desire to dominate any other religion.
Only the perverted Fundamentalists want to change the clock back to the stone age where all people regardless of Race Colour or Creed live the way they demand.
They will be the Religious Fascists of the world.
They tried it in Afghanistan and failed because the world is to diversified to put up with such crap.
2007-09-07 06:46:38
·
answer #4
·
answered by conranger1 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Interesting that the terrorists don't sprout up in American Muslim communities like they do in Europe. This is because believe it or not Americans are quite kind and tolerant of religious and cultural diversity as opposed to Great Britain, France, or Germany. All Democracies are not created equal due to the cultural underpinnings of that nation.
The Ayatollah's and Mullah's in the Middle-East are however bent on using the "Great Satan" of the USA as a rallying point to further their goals in the region-Destroy Israel and Conquer Mecca. This is reminiscent of Hitler rallying Germany against the Jews.
Never again is the rallying cry of those in the West. No people should ever be subjugated as Hitler did to the Jews and most Americans agree with that, regardless of their religous affiliation.
Ret. USAF SNCO
2007-09-06 15:21:56
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Yes they can and they will have a fair bash at it, BUT, I doubt very much that they will succeed, there will come a point when we westerners will say enough is enough and they will be rooted out and exterminated via any means needed, he11 hath no fury like a woman being threatened with burkas and Islam, fvck that $hit.
Add details: hey you below WTF? are you talking about " TOLERANCE" good god man, look at the state Britain and Europe is in due to being "TOLERANT" what an IDOIT you are, the muslims ie: mainly Pakistanis in mainly England have NEVER EVER tried to assimilate, they have always stayed in their own wee cleeks, and for years and years people tried to be nice to them, and they were not interested, and just for the record, the reason that the muslims are uprising in Britain is because of Britain supporting America in Iraq and Afghanistan.
2007-09-06 15:18:50
·
answer #6
·
answered by ~Celtic~Saltire~ 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
this could be greater durable to respond to than plainly, because of the fact in western civilizations, on the single hand the Muslim women individuals are secure via the comparable regulations that preserve the liberty of all of us. yet on the different hand, in the event that they're living in a very conservative Muslim kin, the kin expectancies ought to abate their rights -- working example, a pair of contemporary memories are evoked: One the place the youngster Muslim woman had to positioned on western gown and characteristic a boyfriend, so her radical father killed her, and the different the place the girl needs to be emancipated from her kin because of the fact she became a Christian and is afraid they'll kill her. In Saudi Arabia, Muslim women individuals can't pass out of their residences on my own, can artwork in very constrained factors, ought to positioned on a veil, can no longer trip on my own. additionally, in lots of Muslim international locations, if a woman is raped, she is many times greater victimized via being punished for identifying to purchase raped. there have been contemporary information memories approximately rape sufferers being stoned to dying, lashed, or beheaded. In some Muslim international locations, women individuals at the instant are not allowed to vote. purely google "Civil Rights violations in Muslim international locations," and that supplies you with a wealth of techniques. _____________ yet heavily...a college THESIS...and you're doing "learn" via asking human beings on the internet...? At this point of your education i might think of you would be attentive to a thank you to do scholarly learn.
2016-10-10 02:38:30
·
answer #7
·
answered by severyn 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
See, I think its a huge possiblity that they can cause a huge problem, and kill maybe even 10,000,000 people but just like Germany before the Muslims, the world will come together to smite any idiots who wish to usurp power. Even if it means more A-Bombs.
2007-09-06 15:07:50
·
answer #8
·
answered by Markie B 1
·
1⤊
0⤋
This is what the zionist controlled government of America loves to hear. We have two problems......................Muslims and Zionists. Lets DESTROY both and make this a beautiful country that has not been since pre-1865.
After reading this in the article, I lost interest.........sounded good until this part and the Zionist intent of the article appeared "Muslims should not be given a choice but they should be forced to accept and respect people of other faiths and beliefs, with special regard to the Jews. " Jews are the synagogue of Satan in my book!
2007-09-07 01:09:09
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
Chilling indeed but very true. We are at a gigantic crossroads in history.
Do we value our culture, Christianity, Western Civ, our safety, and our people? Or do we value radical, illogical tolerance, political correctness, diversity, and multiculturalism? YOU make the choice. I choose the former.
2007-09-06 17:55:47
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋